arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2501.08985cs.CLcs.AIcs.GT
收藏

面向错误信息说服的AI智能体人格建模

Personality Modeling for Persuasion of Misinformation using AI Agent

University of Science and Technology of China(中国科学技术大学)

Qianmin Lou, Wentao Xu

AI总结:

本研究采用基于AI智能体的大五人格建模方法,通过AgentScope框架与GLM-4-Flash模型开展多主题错误信息说服模拟,揭示人格特质对说服效果的复杂影响及非传递性规律,为错误信息干预提供人格适配的策略参考。

摘要:

社交媒体平台上错误信息的泛滥凸显了理解个体人格特质如何影响错误信息易感性与传播的必要性。本研究采用创新的基于智能体的建模方法,探究人格特质与错误信息动态之间的关系。我们使用6个体现大五人格特质(外向性、宜人性、神经质)不同维度的AI智能体,在6个不同的错误信息主题上模拟了互动。该实验通过AgentScope框架(多智能体系统开发框架)调用GLM-4-Flash模型实现,生成了90组独特互动,揭示了人格组合影响错误信息说服与抵抗的复杂模式。研究结果表明,分析型与批判型人格特质能提升基于证据的讨论效果,而非攻击性说服策略在错误信息纠正中取得了出人意料的成功。值得注意的是,具备批判特质的智能体在HIV相关错误信息讨论中成功率达59.4%,而采用非攻击性方法的智能体在不同人格组合中均保持了40%以上的稳定说服率。研究还发现说服效果存在非传递性模式,挑战了关于基于人格的影响力的传统假设。这些结果为开发数字环境中具备人格感知的干预措施提供了关键见解,表明有效的错误信息应对策略应优先考虑情感联结与信任建立,而非对抗性方法。研究发现既有助于从理论上理解人格与错误信息的动态关系,也为社交媒体场景下打击错误信息提供了实用策略。

英文摘要:

The proliferation of misinformation on social media platforms has highlighted the need to understand how individual personality traits influence susceptibility to and propagation of misinformation. This study employs an innovative agent-based modeling approach to investigate the relationship between personality traits and misinformation dynamics. Using six AI agents embodying different dimensions of the Big Five personality traits (Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism), we simulated interactions across six diverse misinformation topics. The experiment, implemented through the AgentScope framework using the GLM-4-Flash model, generated 90 unique interactions, revealing complex patterns in how personality combinations affect persuasion and resistance to misinformation. Our findings demonstrate that analytical and critical personality traits enhance effectiveness in evidence-based discussions, while non-aggressive persuasion strategies show unexpected success in misinformation correction. Notably, agents with critical traits achieved a 59.4% success rate in HIV-related misinformation discussions, while those employing non-aggressive approaches maintained consistent persuasion rates above 40% across different personality combinations. The study also revealed a non-transitive pattern in persuasion effectiveness, challenging conventional assumptions about personality-based influence. These results provide crucial insights for developing personality-aware interventions in digital environments and suggest that effective misinformation countermeasures should prioritize emotional connection and trust-building over confrontational approaches. The findings contribute to both theoretical understanding of personality-misinformation dynamics and practical strategies for combating misinformation in social media contexts.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑