arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2501.02935astro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph
收藏

识别冕洞风的挑战

Challenges in identifying the coronal hole wind

Verena Heidrich-Meisner, Sophie Teichmann, Lars Berger, Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber

AI总结:

本文对比电荷态成分、质子等离子体及k-means方法识别冕洞风的差异,发现极小期电荷态方案可能误判慢速太阳风,并建议纳入太阳活动周阶段改进分类。

摘要:

太阳风通常根据其各自的太阳源区进行分类。两种成熟的冕洞风分类方法——基于电荷态成分的方案和基于质子等离子体的方案——在第24太阳活动周末年太阳活动极小期,从高级成分探测器(ACE)数据中识别出的冕洞风占太阳风的比例截然不同。我们研究了2009年冕洞风识别差异的可能解释:基于电荷态成分的方案识别出几乎全是冕洞风,而基于质子等离子体的方案在同一时期识别出几乎没有冕洞风。我们比较了2001年至2010年间各自冕洞风类型的属性及其随太阳活动周的变化。作为比较参考,我们将一种无监督机器学习方法k-means识别出的冕洞风纳入分析。我们发现,基于电荷态成分的方案在太阳活动极小期可能将部分慢速太阳风错误识别为冕洞风。我们考察的k-means分类包含两类冕洞风:第一类在太阳活动极大期占主导,第二类则在太阳活动极小期占主导。ACE在2009年观测到的来自低纬冕洞的冕洞风比例较低是合理的,因为在此期间观测到的低纬冕洞数量非常少。结果表明,面向起源的太阳风分类需要重新审视,同时也表明明确纳入太阳活动周阶段有望改善太阳风分类。

英文摘要:

Solar wind is frequently categorized based on its respective solar source region. Two well-established categorizations of the coronal hole wind, the scheme based on the charge-state composition, and the scheme based on proton plasma, identify a very different fraction of solar wind in the data from the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) as coronal hole wind during the solar activity minimum at the end of solar cycle 24. We investigate possible explanations for the different identifications of the coronal wind in 2009 in the scheme based on the charge-state composition (almost only coronal hole wind) and in the scheme based on the proton plasma (almost no coronal hole wind at the same time). We compared the properties of the respective coronal hole wind types and their changes with solar activity cycle in 2001- 2010. As a comparison reference, we included the coronal hole wind as identified by an unsupervised machine-learning approach, k-means, in our analysis. We find that the scheme based on charge-state composition likely misidentifies some slow solar wind as coronal hole wind during the solar activity minimum. The k-means classification we considered includes two types of coronal hole wind, the first of which is dominant during the solar activity maximum, whereas the second is dominant during the solar activity minimum. A low fraction of coronal hole wind from low-latitude coronal holes observed by ACE in 2009 is plausible because during this time period, a very small number of low-latitude coronal holes was observed. The results imply that the origin-oriented solar wind classification needs to be revisited, and they also suggest that an explicit inclusion of the phase of the solar activity cycle can be expected to improve the classification of the solar wind.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑