arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2412.18703cs.CV

面向鲁棒高效立体匹配的视差不确定性概率建模

Probabilistic Modeling of Disparity Uncertainty for Robust and Efficient Stereo Matching

Southeast University(东南大学);The University of Melbourne(墨尔本大学);Stanford University(斯坦福大学);National University of Singapore(新加坡国立大学);Imperial College London(伦敦帝国学院);Alibaba Group(阿里巴巴集团)

Wenxiao Cai, Dongting Hu, Ruoyan Yin, Jiankang Deng, Huan Fu, Wankou Yang, Mingming Gong

AI总结:

针对现有立体匹配研究中不确定性估计与分析不足、难以分解数据与模型两类不确定性的问题,提出基于贝叶斯风险的不确定性感知立体匹配框架,可高效准确估计两类不确定性且不降低视差预测精度。

摘要:

立体匹配在各类应用中发挥着关键作用,理解不确定性可提升其安全性与可靠性。尽管如此,立体匹配中不确定性的估计与分析在很大程度上仍被忽视。现有研究难以将其分解为数据(偶然)不确定性与模型(认知)不确定性,且通常对不确定性的解释十分有限。这种可解释性至关重要,它能让人们更清晰地理解误差的潜在来源,提升预测置信度与决策流程质量。本文提出一种全新的不确定性感知立体匹配框架。我们采用贝叶斯风险作为不确定性的度量指标,并用它分别估计数据不确定性与模型不确定性。我们基于视差的概率分布系统分析数据不确定性,且无需重复训练模型即可高效估计模型不确定性。我们在四个立体匹配基准数据集上开展了实验,结果表明,所提方法能够准确高效地估计不确定性,且不会牺牲视差预测精度。

英文摘要:

Stereo matching plays a crucial role in various applications, where understanding uncertainty can enhance both safety and reliability. Despite this, the estimation and analysis of uncertainty in stereo matching have been largely overlooked. Previous works struggle to separate it into data (aleatoric) and model (epistemic) components and often provide limited interpretations of uncertainty. This interpretability is essential, as it allows for a clearer understanding of the underlying sources of error, enhancing both prediction confidence and decision-making processes. In this paper, we propose a new uncertainty-aware stereo matching framework. We adopt Bayes risk as the measurement of uncertainty and use it to separately estimate data and model uncertainty. We systematically analyze data uncertainty based on the probabilistic distribution of disparity and efficiently estimate model uncertainty without repeated model training. Experiments are conducted on four stereo benchmarks, and the results demonstrate that our method can estimate uncertainty accurately and efficiently, without sacrificing the disparity prediction accuracy.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑