arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.19087cs.GT

带有委托竞拍的机制设计

Mechanism Design with Delegated Bidding

Gagan Aggarwal, Marios Mertzanidis, Alexandros Psomas, Di Wang

AI总结:

研究委托竞拍下的资源分配问题,通过 Price of Anarchy 分析表明,传统最高价拍卖效率低,而结合特定预算规则的 Trading Post 机制能对所有广义 p-均值目标实现较小效率损失。

摘要:

我们考虑一个设计者的问题,该设计者希望将资源分配给代表,然后由代表将他们收到的资源在他们所代表的个体之间进行分配。受美国最大的慈善机构之一 Feeding America 将捐赠分配给食物银行,然后食物银行再将捐赠进一步分配给食物无保障个体的方式的启发,我们专注于使用人造货币的机制。我们通过 Price of Anarchy 的视角比较了拍卖,涉及三个经典的福利目标:功利主义社会福利(个体效用之和)、Nash 社会福利(个体效用之积)和平均主义社会福利(个体效用之最小值)。我们证明了在温和的技术约束下,所有将每个物品分配给最高出价者的拍卖的 Price of Anarchy 的强下界;这包括 Feeding America 当前的拍卖,即 First-Price 拍卖。形成鲜明对比的是,我们的主要结果表明,将 Shapley 和 Shubik 的经典 Trading Post 机制适应于此设置,并结合 Feeding America 的预算规则选择(每个代表获得的人造货币数量等于其代表的个体数量),能同时对所有广义 $p$-均值目标实现较小的 Price of Anarchy。我们对 Trading Post 机制的 Price of Anarchy 的界限取决于 $\ell$:底层估值矩阵的秩和“不相干性”的乘积,它们共同捕捉了矩阵的值“分散程度”的概念。这个概念在矩阵补全文献中极具影响力,据我们所知,在我们之前从未在拍卖理论中使用过。也许令人惊讶的是,我们证明了对 $\ell$ 的依赖是必要的:Trading Post 机制的 Price of Anarchy 是 $\Omega(\sqrt{\ell})$。

英文摘要:

We consider the problem of a designer who wants to allocate resources to representatives, that then distribute the resources they receive among the individuals they represent. Motivated by the way Feeding America, one of the largest U.S. charities, allocates donations to food banks, which then further distribute the donations to food-insecure individuals, we focus on mechanisms that use artificial currencies. We compare auctions through the lens of the Price of Anarchy, with respect to three canonical welfare objectives: utilitarian social welfare (sum of individuals' utilities), Nash social welfare (product of individuals' utilities), and egalitarian social welfare (minimum of individuals' utilities). We prove strong lower bounds on the Price of Anarchy of all auctions that allocate each item to the highest bidder, subject to a mild technical constraint; this includes Feeding America's current auction, the First-Price auction. In sharp contrast, our main result shows that adapting the classic Trading Post mechanism of Shapley and Shubik to this setting, and coupled with Feeding America's choice of budget rule (each representative gets an amount of artificial currency equal to the number of individuals it represents), achieves a small Price of Anarchy for all generalized $p$-mean objectives simultaneously. Our bound on the Price of Anarchy of the Trading Post mechanism depends on $\ell$: the product of the rank and the ``incoherence'' of the underlying valuation matrix, which together capture a notion of how ``spread out'' the values of a matrix are. This notion has been extremely influential in the matrix completion literature, and, to the best of our knowledge, has never been used in auction theory prior to our work. Perhaps surprisingly, we prove that the dependence on $\ell$ is necessary: the Price of Anarchy of the Trading Post mechanism is $Ω(\sqrt{\ell})$.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑