arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2407.02440q-bio.PEnlin.AO
收藏

解决Hamilton临时形成随机群体模型中的囚徒困境陷阱

Solving the prisoner's dilemma trap in Hamilton's model of temporarily formed random groups

José F. Fontanari, Mauro Santos

AI总结:

该研究挑战传统认知,通过解析证明双亲有性生殖下强利他行为可在Hamilton的临时随机群体模型中演化,为强利他主义起源问题提供解决方案,还提出可重新评估病毒共感染中的合作现象。

摘要:

在强利他情境下,合作者无法从其对公共物品的贡献中获益,解释该情境下合作的演化是一个具有挑战性的问题,这需要合作者之间存在正向 assortment(即合作者必须倾向于与其他合作者交往),或是对背叛者进行惩罚。对这些极端措施的需求源于近五十年前Hamilton提出的一个临时形成随机群体的群体选择模型的分析,该模型用于描述种群中利他行为的命运。我们在此通过解析证明,与传统观点不同,在双亲有性生殖的情况下,强利他行为在Hamilton的原始模型中能够演化。此外,当合作的成本较低,且群体成员共享的放大贡献较大时,合作是均衡状态下唯一的稳定策略。因此,我们的结果为强利他主义的“起源问题”——即合作如何从初始的低合作者频率中发展起来——提供了解决方案。我们讨论了对病毒共感染情境下合作的可能重新评估,因为即使在囚徒困境适用的情境中,合作也可能受到青睐。

英文摘要:

Explaining the evolution of cooperation in the strong altruism scenario, where a cooperator does not benefit from her contribution to the public goods, is a challenging problem that requires positive assortment among cooperators (i.e., cooperators must tend to associate with other cooperators) or punishment of defectors. The need for these drastic measures stems from the analysis of a group selection model of temporarily formed random groups introduced by Hamilton nearly fifty years ago to describe the fate of altruistic behavior in a population. Challenging conventional wisdom, we show analytically here that strong altruism evolves in Hamilton's original model in the case of biparental sexual reproduction. Moreover, when the cost of cooperation is small and the amplified contribution shared by group members is large, cooperation is the only stable strategy in equilibrium. Thus, our results provide a solution to the `problem of origination' of strong altruism, i.e. how cooperation can take off from an initial low frequency of cooperators. We discuss a possible reassessment of cooperation in cases of viral co-infection, as cooperation may even be favored in situations where the prisoner's dilemma applies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑