arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2403.08495cs.CL
收藏

大型语言模型的自动交互式评估:基于状态感知的病人模拟器

Automatic Interactive Evaluation for Large Language Models with State Aware Patient Simulator

Shanghai Jiao Tong University(上海交通大学);Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory(上海人工智能实验室)

Yusheng Liao, Yutong Meng, Yuhao Wang, Hongcheng Liu, Yanfeng Wang, Yu Wang

AI总结:

本文提出自动交互式评估框架与状态感知病人模拟器,通过多轮医患模拟动态评估大模型临床能力,实验验证其有效性与人工评估一致。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)在人类交互中展现出了卓越的能力,但它们在医学领域的应用仍未得到充分探索。以往的研究主要关注通过考试来评估医学知识的表现,这远未达到真实场景的要求,未能充分评估LLMs在临床任务上的能力。为了提升大型语言模型(LLMs)在医疗保健中的应用,本文引入了自动交互式评估(AIE)框架和状态感知病人模拟器(SAPS),旨在弥合传统LLM评估与临床实践精细需求之间的差距。与先前依赖静态医学知识评估的方法不同,AIE和SAPS通过多轮医患模拟提供了一个动态、逼真的评估平台。这种方法更贴近真实的临床场景,并能详细分析LLMs在应对复杂患者交互时的行为。我们的大量实验验证证明了AIE框架的有效性,其结果与人工评估高度一致,突显了其在革新医学LLM测试以改善医疗服务方面的潜力。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in human interactions, yet their application within the medical field remains insufficiently explored. Previous works mainly focus on the performance of medical knowledge with examinations, which is far from the realistic scenarios, falling short in assessing the abilities of LLMs on clinical tasks. In the quest to enhance the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in healthcare, this paper introduces the Automated Interactive Evaluation (AIE) framework and the State-Aware Patient Simulator (SAPS), targeting the gap between traditional LLM evaluations and the nuanced demands of clinical practice. Unlike prior methods that rely on static medical knowledge assessments, AIE and SAPS provide a dynamic, realistic platform for assessing LLMs through multi-turn doctor-patient simulations. This approach offers a closer approximation to real clinical scenarios and allows for a detailed analysis of LLM behaviors in response to complex patient interactions. Our extensive experimental validation demonstrates the effectiveness of the AIE framework, with outcomes that align well with human evaluations, underscoring its potential to revolutionize medical LLM testing for improved healthcare delivery.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑