arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.01995cs.AIcs.CL

像医生一样思考:通过探索诊断知识图谱进行对话诊断

Think Like a Doctor: Conversational Diagnosis through the Exploration of Diagnostic Knowledge Graphs

Graduate School of Data Science, Seoul National University(数据科学研究生院,首尔国立大学)

Jeongmoon Won, Seungwon Kook, Yohan Jo

AI总结:

本文提出一种通过探索诊断知识图谱进行对话诊断的系统,通过两步推理生成和验证诊断假设,提高诊断准确性和效率,并通过医生评估验证其临床实用性。

摘要:

对话诊断需要多轮问诊历史,其中代理会通过澄清问题来细化诊断假设,在信息不完整的情况下进行诊断。现有方法通常依赖模型的参数知识或假设患者提供丰富具体的信息,这在现实中并不成立。为了解决这些限制,我们提出了一种对话诊断系统,通过探索诊断知识图谱进行两步推理:(i)从对话上下文中生成诊断假设,(ii)通过澄清问题验证假设,直到最终诊断。由于评估系统需要一个能真实回应系统问题的患者模拟器,我们采用了已建立的模拟器并结合MIMIC-IV的患者资料。我们进一步将其调整为描述症状模糊,以反映现实世界中早期临床接触时的患者情况。实验显示,与强基线相比,诊断准确性和效率有所提高,医生的评估支持我们模拟器的真实性和生成问题的临床价值。我们的代码将在发表时发布。

英文摘要:

Conversational diagnosis requires multi-turn history-taking, where an agent asks clarifying questions to refine differential diagnoses under incomplete information. Existing approaches often rely on the parametric knowledge of a model or assume that patients provide rich and concrete information, which is unrealistic. To address these limitations, we propose a conversational diagnosis system that explores a diagnostic knowledge graph to reason in two steps: (i) generating diagnostic hypotheses from the dialogue context, and (ii) verifying hypotheses through clarifying questions, which are repeated until a final diagnosis is reached. Since evaluating the system requires a realistic patient simulator that responds to the system's questions, we adopt PatientSim, a persona-driven patient simulator, together with patient profiles from MIMIC-IV. We further adapt it with low-specificity symptom reporting to reflect how real-world patients describe symptoms vaguely during early clinical encounters. Experiments show improved diagnostic accuracy and efficiency over strong baselines, and physician evaluations support the realism of our simulator and the clinical utility of the generated clarifying questions. Our code will be released upon publication.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑