arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2512.20983cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

医疗对话中大语言模型错误的自动复制

Automatic Replication of LLM Mistakes in Medical Conversations

Lumos AI

Oleksii Proniakin, Diego Fajardo, Ruslan Nazarenko, Razvan Marinescu

AI总结:

本文提出MedMistake自动管道,通过提取医疗对话中LLM的错误生成单次问答对,构建基准测试集,验证了GPT、Claude和Grok在医疗问答任务中的最佳性能。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)在临床环境中越来越多地使用多维评分标准进行评估,这些标准量化了推理质量、安全性和以患者为中心性。然而,复制其他LLM模型中的特定错误并不容易,通常需要手动努力。我们介绍了MedMistake,一个自动管道,该管道从患者-医生对话中提取LLM的错误,并将其转换为单次问答对的基准。我们的管道(1)创建了LLM患者和LLM医生之间的复杂对话数据,(2)由两名LLM评委在多种维度上进行评估,(3)从这些错误中创建了简化后的单次问答场景。我们发布了MedMistake-All数据集,其中包含3,390个单次问答对,目前GPT-5和Gemini 2.5 Pro无法正确回答,由两名LLM评委判断。我们使用医疗专家验证了211/3390个问题(MedMistake-Bench),并用其对12种前沿LLM进行了最终评估:Claude Opus 4.5、Claude Sonnet 4.5、DeepSeek-Chat、Gemini 2.5 Pro、Gemini 3 Pro、GPT-4o、GPT-5、GPT-5.1、GPT-5.2、Grok 4、Grok 4.1、Mistral Large。我们发现GPT模型、Claude和Grok在MedMistake-Bench上表现最佳。我们发布了由医生验证的基准(MedMistake-Bench)以及完整数据集(MedMistake-All)在https://huggingface.co/datasets/TheLumos/MedicalMistakeBenchmark。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated in clinical settings using multi-dimensional rubrics which quantify reasoning quality, safety, and patient-centeredness. Yet, replicating specific mistakes in other LLM models is not straightforward and often requires manual effort. We introduce MedMistake, an automatic pipeline that extracts mistakes LLMs make in patient-doctor conversations and converts them into a benchmark of single-shot QA pairs. Our pipeline (1) creates complex, conversational data between an LLM patient and LLM doctor, (2) runs an evaluation with a committee of 2 LLM judges across a variety of dimensions and (3) creates simplified single-shot QA scenarios from those mistakes. We release MedMistake-All, a dataset of 3,390 single-shot QA pairs where GPT-5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro are currently failing to answer correctly, as judged by two LLM judges. We used medical experts to validate a subset of 211/3390 questions (MedMistake-Bench), which we used to run a final evaluation of 12 frontier LLMs: Claude Opus 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4.5, DeepSeek-Chat, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 3 Pro, GPT-4o, GPT-5, GPT-5.1, GPT-5.2, Grok 4, Grok 4.1, Mistral Large. We found that GPT models, Claude and Grok obtained the best performance on MedMistake-Bench. We release both the doctor-validated benchmark (MedMistake-Bench), as well as the full dataset (MedMistake-All) at https://huggingface.co/datasets/TheLumos/MedicalMistakeBenchmark.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑