arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.04461stat.ME
收藏

数据分析流程与模块化贝叶斯建模

On Data Analysis Pipelines and Modular Bayesian Modeling

Erin Lipman, Abel Rodriguez

AI总结:

本文提出了一个统一框架,在双模块数据分析流程中对比 two-step、cut 和 joint inference,并通过两个示例展示了它们在不确定性传播、鲁棒性与计算成本之间的权衡。

摘要:

实现数据分析流程最常见的方法是从上游模块获取点估计,然后在处理下游模块时将其视为已知量。这种方法简单直接,但可能低估与任何最终估计相关的总体不确定性。另一种方法是使用贝叶斯分层模型联合估计各模块的参数,其优点是将上游不确定性传播到下游估计中。然而,当模块设定错误时,这种联合模型可能会出现意想不到的行为。此外,分层模型需要开发专门的计算实现,这可能既费力又计算昂贵。Cut inference 修改了后验分布以阻止某些参数之间的信息流动,为数据分析流程中的统计推断提供了第三种选择。本文提出了一个统一框架,在包含两个模块的数据分析流程中涵盖了 two-step、cut 和 joint inference,并使用两个示例说明了与这些方法相关的权衡。我们的研究表明,cut inference 为数据分析流程提供了一定程度的鲁棒性和易于实现性,且在统计推断方面的成本较低。

英文摘要:

The most common approach to implementing data analysis pipelines involves obtaining point estimates from the upstream modules and then treating these as known quantities when working with the downstream ones. This approach is straightforward, but it is likely to underestimate the overall uncertainty associated with any final estimates. An alternative approach involves estimating parameters from the modules jointly using a Bayesian hierarchical model, which has the advantage of propagating upstream uncertainty into the downstream estimates. However, when modules are misspecified, such a joint model can behave in unexpected ways. Furthermore, hierarchical models require the development of ad-hoc computational implementations that can be laborious and computationally expensive. Cut inference modifies the posterior distribution to prevent information flow between certain parameters and provides a third alternative for statistical inference in data analysis pipelines. This paper presents a unified framework that encompasses two-step, cut, and joint inference in the context of data analysis pipelines with two modules and uses two examples to illustrate the tradeoffs associated with these approaches. Our work shows that cut inference provides both some level of robustness and ease of implementation for data analysis pipelines at a lower cost in terms of statistical inference.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑