arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2310.04321math.OC
收藏

电解槽辅助服务的价值

The Value of Ancillary Services for Electrolyzers

Andrea Gloppen Johnsen, Lesia Mitridati, Donato Zarrilli, Jalal Kazempour

AI总结:

本文研究电解槽参与频率备用市场的价值,通过混合整数线性规划优化投标,发现灵活投标可提升利润达47%,并建议运营商调整投标结构、所有者考虑能源密集型备用。

摘要:

尽管电解槽主要用于制氢,但它们可以通过提供各种辅助服务来支持电力系统,从而开辟新的收入来源,增强其经济可行性。本文研究了电解槽参与频率支撑备用市场的策略,分析了投标结构和激活强度对其价值的影响。我们开发了一个混合整数线性规划,以协同优化电力采购和备用提供,并从解析上推导出备用提供的机会成本,该成本决定了最优投标价格。利用丹麦西部的历史价格和频率数据,我们表明,不对称的、按小时计的备用产品通常不涉及机会成本,并且可以将利润提高多达47%。然而,能源密集型备用可能会干扰制氢生产,并存在需求无法满足的风险。我们的研究结果表明,灵活的投标可以减轻这些风险,同时保持盈利能力。我们还强调了跨备用产品多样化的好处,并提出两项建议:系统运营商应重新考虑备用投标结构,以更好地适应电解槽;电解槽所有者不应在氢需求灵活时忽视能源密集型备用服务。

英文摘要:

Although primarily designed for hydrogen production, electrolyzers can support power systems by providing various ancillary services, opening new revenue streams that enhance their economic viability. This paper investigates the participation of an electrolyzer in frequency-supporting reserve markets, analyzing how bid structures and activation intensities affect its value. We develop a mixed-integer linear program to co-optimize electricity procurement and reserve provision, and analytically derive the opportunity cost of reserve provision, which determines the optimal bid price. Using historical price and frequency data from western Denmark, we show that asymmetric, hourly reserve products often entail no opportunity cost and can increase profits by up to 47%. However, energy-intensive reserves may disrupt hydrogen production and risk unmet demand. Our findings reveal that flexible bidding can mitigate these risks while maintaining profitability. We also highlight the benefits of diversifying across reserve products and offer two recommendations: System operators should reconsider reserve bid structures to better accommodate electrolyzers, and electrolyzer owners should not overlook energy-intensive reserve services when hydrogen demand is flexible.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑