arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2305.14865cs.GTcs.CY

AI治理的博弈论框架

A Game-Theoretic Framework for AI Governance

Na Zhang, Kun Yue, Chao Fang

AI总结:

本研究提出首个基于Stackelberg博弈的AI治理博弈论建模框架,将监管机构与AI公司的战略互动映射到民用及安全关键领域,为技术政策提供定量与AI驱动的新范式。

摘要:

作为一种变革性的通用技术,AI已经赋能了各行各业,并将通过无处不在的应用继续塑造我们的生活。尽管广泛的AI部署带来了巨大收益,但解决相关的下行风险至关重要,从而确保AI的发展是安全、公平、负责任且与人类价值观对齐的。为此,我们需要建立有效的AI治理。在本研究中,我们表明监管机构与AI公司之间的战略互动具有类似于Stackelberg博弈的内在结构,这促使我们提出了一个用于AI治理的博弈论建模框架。具体而言,我们将这种互动表述为由一个领导者和一个跟随者组成的Stackelberg博弈,与其同时博弈的对应形式相比,这捕捉了底层的博弈结构。此外,领导者的选择自然产生了两种设定。我们证明了我们提出的模型可以从两个方面作为统一的AI治理框架:首先,我们可以将一种设定映射到民用领域的AI治理,将另一种映射到安全关键和军事领域;其次,可以根据智能系统的能力选择这两种治理设定。据我们所知,这项工作首次使用博弈论来分析和构建AI治理。我们还讨论了有前景的方向,希望这能有助于激发对这一跨学科领域的研究兴趣。总而言之,我们希望这项工作能有助于为技术政策开发一种新范式:为技术政策领域提供定量和AI驱动的方法,这在克服现有定性方法的许多缺点方面具有重大前景。

英文摘要:

As a transformative general-purpose technology, AI has empowered various industries and will continue to shape our lives through ubiquitous applications. Despite the enormous benefits from wide-spread AI deployment, it is crucial to address associated downside risks and therefore ensure AI advances are safe, fair, responsible, and aligned with human values. To do so, we need to establish effective AI governance. In this work, we show that the strategic interaction between the regulatory agencies and AI firms has an intrinsic structure reminiscent of a Stackelberg game, which motivates us to propose a game-theoretic modeling framework for AI governance. In particular, we formulate such interaction as a Stackelberg game composed of a leader and a follower, which captures the underlying game structure compared to its simultaneous play counterparts. Furthermore, the choice of the leader naturally gives rise to two settings. And we demonstrate that our proposed model can serves as a unified AI governance framework from two aspects: firstly we can map one setting to the AI governance of civil domains and the other to the safety-critical and military domains, secondly, the two settings of governance could be chosen contingent on the capability of the intelligent systems. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to use game theory for analyzing and structuring AI governance. We also discuss promising directions and hope this can help stimulate research interest in this interdisciplinary area. On a high, we hope this work would contribute to develop a new paradigm for technology policy: the quantitative and AI-driven methods for the technology policy field, which holds significant promise for overcoming many shortcomings of existing qualitative approaches.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑