arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2305.05850eess.SYcs.SYmath.OC

随机电力市场出清问题的新公式与定价机制

New Formulations and Pricing Mechanisms for Stochastic Electricity Market Clearing Problem

Sakitha Ariyarathne, Harsha Gangammanavar

AI总结:

本文提出随机电力市场出清问题的新公式,通过设计对偶优化问题构建定价机制,在每情景下实现成本回收与有界价格扭曲,并保留长期收益充足性,经数值实验验证。

摘要:

我们基于随机规划原理,提出了随机电力市场出清问题的新公式。以往的分析已证实,经典随机规划模型能有效刻画日前调度与实时调度及其价格之间的关系。由此产生的量在期望意义上展现出收益充足性、成本回收和价格扭曲的理想保证。受这些结果启发,我们开发了替代的随机规划模型公式,这些公式在建模非预期性要求的方式上有所不同。我们通过为这些模型设计合适的对偶优化问题,设计了新的定价机制。我们分析这些定价机制,以评估其为系统运营商提供收益充足性、为发电商提供成本回收以及价格扭曲的能力。与以往在期望意义上产生理想属性的机制不同,我们的一种定价机制在每种情景下都扩展了成本回收和有界价格扭曲的益处,同时为系统运营商保留了长期收益充足性。我们通过在知名测试系统上进行的数值实验展示了这些益处。

英文摘要:

We present new formulations of the stochastic electricity market clearing problem based on the principles of stochastic programming. Previous analyses have established that the canonical stochastic programming model effectively captures the relationship between the day-ahead and real-time dispatch and prices. The resulting quantities exhibit desirable guarantees of revenue adequacy, cost recovery, and price distortion in expectation. Motivated by these results, we develop alternative stochastic programming model formulations that differ in how we model the nonanticipativity requirement. We design new pricing mechanisms by developing suitable dual optimization problems for these models. We analyze these pricing mechanisms to assess their ability to provide revenue adequacy for the system operators, cost recovery for generators, and price distortion. Unlike the previous mechanisms that yield the desired properties in expectation, one of our pricing mechanisms extends the benefits of cost recovery and bounded price distortion under every scenario while retaining the long-run revenue adequacy for the system operator. We demonstrate these benefits through numerical experiments conducted on well-known test systems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑