arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
稍安勿躁,官方尚未更新
arXiv 2304.09030physics.comp-ph
收藏

有效且稳定的 Langevin 动力学积分器的比较

Comparison of effective and stable Langevin dynamics integrators

Bogdan Tanygin, Simone Melchionna

AI总结:

本文通过不同用例和实际特征,重点比较 Langevin 动力学积分器在速度与位置自相关函数上的表现,并提出工业开源软件方法以系统评估其稳定性、准确性和计算效率。

摘要:

Langevin 和 Brownian 模拟在计算研究中扮演着重要角色,最先进的积分算法提供的轨迹在稳定性范围和再现统计平均值的准确性方面各不相同。积分器的实际可用性是一个重要方面,它允许选择较大的时间步长,同时确保数值稳定性和整体计算效率。在这项工作中,选择了不同的用例和实际特征,以便对积分器进行累积比较,重点是评估导出的速度和位置自相关函数,这种比较在文献中常常被忽视。建议采用标准的工业开源软件方法系统地比较不同的算法。

英文摘要:

Langevin and Brownian simulations play a prominent role in computational research, and state of the art integration algorithms provide trajectories with different stability ranges and accuracy in reproducing statistical averages. The practical usability of integrators is an important aspect to allow choosing large time steps while ensuring numerical stability and overall computational efficiency. In this work, different use cases and practical features are selected in order to perform a cumulative comparison of integrators with a focus on evaluating the derived velocity and position autocorrelation functions, a comparison that is often disregarded in the literature. A standard industrial open-source software methodology is suggested to compare systematically the different algorithms.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑