arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1904.00532physics.comp-phcond-mat.stat-mechcs.NAmath.NA
收藏

现代 Langevin 积分器在粗粒化聚合物熔体模拟中的比较

Comparison of Modern Langevin Integrators for Simulations of Coarse-Grained Polymer Melts

Temple University(天普大学);National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute(国家心肺血液研究所)

Joshua Finkelstein, Giacomo Fiorin, Benjamin Seibold

AI总结:

本文研究了现代 Langevin 积分器在非平凡粗粒化分子系统中的性能,探讨了在不引入不可接受误差的情况下,可以使用多大的积分时间步长,并分析了不同积分器在小摩擦参数下的表现以及大步长下的偏差。

摘要:

对于广泛的现象,当前的计算能力并不总是允许对高维分子系统进行完全原子模拟以达到感兴趣的时标。粗粒化(CG)是一种已建立的方法,用于减轻计算限制的影响,同时保留原子模拟中使用的相同算法。了解如 Langevin 积分器等算法在非平凡 CG 分子系统中的表现至关重要,特别是如何在不引入不可接受误差的情况下使用较大的积分时间步长。为此,我们检查了三种不同的 Langevin 积分器:最近开发的 BAOAB 方法(由 Leimkuhler 和 Matthews 提出)、Gronbech-Jensen 和 Farago 方法(G-JF)以及常用的 Brunger-Brooks-Karplus 积分器(也称为 BBK)。我们计算并分析了每个积分器的关键统计特性。我们的结果表明,当使用小摩擦参数时,三种积分器表现相似;然而,超出该范围时,使用大积分步长会导致所有积分方法的扩散性和稳态分布产生显著偏差,除了 G-JF 除外。

英文摘要:

For a wide range of phenomena, current computational ability does not always allow for fully atomistic simulations of high-dimensional molecular systems to reach time scales of interest. Coarse-graining (CG) is an established approach to alleviate the impact of computational limits while retaining the same algorithms used in atomistic simulations. It is of importance to understand how algorithms such as Langevin integrators perform on non-trivial CG molecular systems, and in particular how large of an integration time step can be used without introducing unacceptable amounts of error into averaged quantities of interest. To investigate this, we examined three different Langevin integrators on a CG polymer melt: the recently developed BAOAB method by Leimkuhler and Matthews, the Gronbech-Jensen and Farago method, or G-JF, and the frequently used Brunger-Brooks-Karplus integrator, also known as BBK. We compute and analyze key statistical properties for each. Our results indicate that the three integrators perform similarly when using a small friction parameter; however, outside of this regime the use of large integration steps produces significant deviations from the predicted diffusivity and steady-state distributions for all integration methods examined with the exception of G-JF.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑