arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2301.08433cs.CV

通过带遮挡预测的多视图特征匹配进行无监督光场深度估计

Unsupervised Light Field Depth Estimation via Multi-view Feature Matching with Occlusion Prediction

The University of Hong Kong(香港大学)

Shansi Zhang, Nan Meng, Edmund Y. Lam

AI总结:

针对光场深度估计缺乏深度标签的问题,提出无监督框架,通过多视图特征匹配、遮挡预测加权光度损失及视差融合提升精度、鲁棒性与泛化性。

摘要:

从光场(LF)图像中估计深度是众多应用中的基础步骤。近年来,基于学习的方法相比传统方法取得了更高的精度和效率。然而,为监督训练获取充足的深度标签成本高昂。本文提出一种从LF图像估计深度的无监督框架。首先,我们设计了一个由粗到细结构的视差估计网络(DispNet),用于根据不同视图组合预测视差图。该网络显式执行多视图特征匹配,以有效学习对应关系。由于遮挡可能导致光度一致性被破坏,我们引入遮挡预测网络(OccNet)来预测遮挡图,并将其作为光度损失的逐元素权重,以解决遮挡问题并辅助视差学习。借助多个输入组合估计出的视差图,我们随后提出一种基于估计误差并能有效处理遮挡的视差融合策略,以获得精度更高的最终视差图。实验结果表明,我们的方法在密集和稀疏LF图像上均取得优越性能,并且与其他方法相比,在真实世界LF图像上表现出更好的鲁棒性和泛化能力。

英文摘要:

Depth estimation from light field (LF) images is a fundamental step for numerous applications. Recently, learning-based methods have achieved higher accuracy and efficiency than the traditional methods. However, it is costly to obtain sufficient depth labels for supervised training. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised framework to estimate depth from LF images. First, we design a disparity estimation network (DispNet) with a coarse-to-fine structure to predict disparity maps from different view combinations. It explicitly performs multi-view feature matching to learn the correspondences effectively. As occlusions may cause the violation of photo-consistency, we introduce an occlusion prediction network (OccNet) to predict the occlusion maps, which are used as the element-wise weights of photometric loss to solve the occlusion issue and assist the disparity learning. With the disparity maps estimated by multiple input combinations, we then propose a disparity fusion strategy based on the estimated errors with effective occlusion handling to obtain the final disparity map with higher accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves superior performance on both the dense and sparse LF images, and also shows better robustness and generalization on the real-world LF images compared to the other methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑