The effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions to curb the spread of SARS-CoV-2 is determined by numerous contextual factors, including adherence. Conventional wisdom holds that the effectiveness of protective behaviour such as wearing masks always increases with the number of people adopting it. Here we show in a simulation study that this is not true in general. We employ a parsimonious network model based on the well-established empirical facts that (i) adherence to such interventions wanes over time and (ii) individuals tend to align their adoption strategies with their close social ties (homophily). When combining these assumptions, a broad dynamical regime emerges where the individual-level infection risk reduction for those adopting protective behaviour increases as the adherence to protective behavior decreases. For instance, for a protective coverage of 10% we find the infection risk for adopting individuals can be reduced by close to 30% compared to situations where the coverage is 60%. Using estimates for the effectiveness of surgical masks, we find that reductions in relative risk of masking versus non-masking individuals range between 5% and 15%, i.e., vary by a factor of three. This small coverage effect originates from system-dynamical network properties that conspire to increase the chance that an outbreak will be over before the pathogen is able to invade small but tightly connected groups of individuals that protect themselves. Our results contradict the popular belief that masking becomes ineffectual as more people drop their masks and might have far-reaching implications for the protection of vulnerable population groups under resurgent infection waves.
Universal Masking is Urgent in the COVID-19 Pandemic: SEIR and Agent Based Models, Empirical Validation, Policy Recommendations
HKUST (University of Science & Technology)(香港科技大学);International Computer Science Institute(国际计算机科学研究所);Ecole de Guerre Economique(经济战争学院);University of Cambridge(剑桥大学);Manifold Research;University College London(伦敦大学学院);ELU AI Ltd(ELU AI有限公司);Royal Free Hospital(皇家自由医院);Population Research Institute, The Family Federation of Finland(芬兰家庭联合会人口研究所)
COVID-ABS: An Agent-Based Model of COVID-19 Epidemic to Simulate Health and Economic Effects of Social Distancing Interventions
Instituto Federal do Norte de Minas Gerais (IFNMG)(北米纳斯吉拉斯联邦学院);Federal University of Minas Gerais(米纳斯吉拉斯联邦大学);Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais(米纳斯吉拉斯联邦大学);Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto(奥罗普雷托联邦大学)
Voluntary nonpharmaceutical intervention as a feedback-evolving game
CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD(法国国家科学研究中心、高等教育与研究学院、热带研究所);Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University(长崎大学热带医学研究所);Multidisciplinary Pandemic Research Center, Nagasaki University(长崎大学多学科流行病研究中心);National Institute of Genetics(国立遗传学研究所);SOKENDAI(综合研究大学院大学);The University of Queensland(昆士兰大学);Yokohama National University(横滨国立大学);The University of Tokyo(东京大学)
Effectiveness of probabilistic contact tracing in epidemic containment: the role of super-spreaders and transmission path reconstruction
Politecnico di Torino(都灵理工大学);Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine(意大利基因组医学研究所);Politecnico di Milano(米兰理工大学);Universidad Complutense(康普顿斯大学);Collegio Carlo Alberto(卡洛·阿尔贝托学院)