arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2209.09413eess.SYcs.SY

一种量化逆变器型资源三类快速频率响应的统一分析方法

A Unified Analytical Method to Quantify Three Types of Fast Frequency Response from Inverter-based Resources

Shuan Dong, Xin Fang, Jin Tan, Ningchao Gao, Xiaofan Cui, Anderson Hoke

AI总结:

针对逆变器型资源占比提升导致电力系统N-1故障后频率最低点偏低的问题,提出一种可同时考虑三类快速频率响应的分析型频率最低点预测方法,经IEEE 39节点系统仿真验证其准确高效。

摘要:

随着逆变器型资源(inverter-based resources, IBRs)占比提升,电力系统在N-1故障后的频率最低点更低,可能引发非预期的低频减载(under-frequency load shedding, UFLS)。为应对这一挑战,可对IBRs编程使其提供至少三类快速频率响应(fast frequency response, FFR),即阶跃响应、比例响应(P/f下垂响应)和微分响应(虚拟惯量)。但这些异构FFR给电力系统频率动态研究带来了困难。因此,本文提出了一种分析型频率最低点预测方法,可同时考虑IBRs提供的所有三种潜在FFR形式。该方法能快速准确地估计N-1发电跳闸故障后的频率最低点。方法基于频率最低点的闭式解,该解由考虑调速器动态和三类FFR的二阶系统频率响应模型推导得到。在含不同类型FFR的IEEE 39节点系统中的仿真结果表明,所提方法可在各种扰动下准确快速地预测频率最低点。

英文摘要:

With more inverter-based resources (IBRs), our power systems have lower frequency nadirs following N-1 contingencies, and undesired under-frequency load shedding (UFLS) can occur. To address this challenge, IBRs can be programmed to provide at least three types of fast frequency response (FFR), e.g., step response, proportional response (P/f droop response), and derivative response (synthetic inertia). However, these heterogeneous FFR challenge the study of power system frequency dynamics. Thus, this paper develops an analytical frequency nadir prediction method that allows for the consideration of all three potential forms of FFR provided by IBRs. The proposed method provides fast and accurate frequency nadir estimation after N-1 generation tripping contingencies. Our method is grounded on the closed-form solution for the frequency nadir, which is solved from the second-order system frequency response model considering the governor dynamics and three types of FFR. The simulation results in the IEEE 39-bus system with different types of FFR demonstrate that the proposed method provides an accurate and fast prediction of the frequency nadir under various disturbances.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑