arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2206.02420hep-th
收藏

在广义Legendre变换中重新审视Atiyah-Hitchin流形

Revisiting Atiyah-Hitchin manifold in the generalized Legendre transform

Masato Arai, Kurando Baba, Radu A. Ionas

AI总结:

本文在广义Legendre变换框架下重新审视Atiyah-Hitchin流形的构造,指出了Ivanov-Roček与Ionas在围道选择上的差异导致Kähler势和度规不同,并首次基于Ivanov和Roček的围道推导出了实Kähler势和度规。

摘要:

我们在广义Legendre变换方法中重新审视了Atiyah-Hitchin流形的构造。。该流形最初由Ivanov和Rocek研究,随后由Ionas进行了更多探讨,后者计算了Kähler势和Kähler度规的显式形式。前者与后者之间存在差异。在广义Legendre变换方法中,Kähler势由带有全纯坐标的一个函数的围道积分构造。后者中的围道选择与前者的不同,这种差异可能导致Kähler势并最终在Kähler度规上产生差异。我们表明前者仅给出符合其定义的实Kähler势,而后者产生复Kähler势。我们首次用Ivanov和Roček所考虑围道的全纯坐标导出了Atiyah-Hitchin流形的Kähler势和度规。

英文摘要:

We revisit construction of the Atiyah-Hitchin manifold in the generalized Legendre transform approach. This is originally studied by Ivanov and Rocek and is subsequently investigated more by Ionas, in the latter of which the explicit forms of the Kähler potential and the Kähler metric are calculated. There is a difference between the former and the latter. In the generalized Legendre transform approach, a Kähler potential is constructed from the contour integration of one function with holomorphic coordinates. The choice of the contour in the latter is different from the former's one, whose difference may yield a discrepancy in the Kähler potential and eventually in the Kähler metric. We show that the former only gives the real Kähler potential, which is consistent with its definition, while the latter yields the complex one. We derive the Kähler potential and the metric for the Atiyah-Hitchin manifold in terms of holomorphic coordinates for the contour considered by Ivanov and Roček for the first time.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑