arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2201.04988cond-mat.mtrl-sci
收藏

单分子磁体两磁矩夹角的精确测量及其构型稳定性

Precise measurement of angles between two magnetic moments and their configurational stability in single-molecule magnets

Rasmus Westerström, Vasilii Dubrovin, Katrin Junghans, Aram Kostanyan, Christin Schlesier, Jan Dreiser, Bernd Büchner, Stanislav M. Avdoshenko, Alexey A. Popov, Thomas Greber

摘要:

双核镧系单分子磁体低温磁耦合的一个关键参数是由两个$4f$磁矩之间的交换和偶极相互作用产生的势垒$U_{FA}$。在这里,我们扩展的赝自旋模型先前用于描述的双核endofullerenes的基态占单离子各向异性轴的取向的变化,并将其应用到两个SMM Dy $_2$ ScN@C $_{80}$和Dy $_2$ TiC@C $_{80}$。X射线磁性圆二色性(XMCD)表明两种分子中的$J_z=15/2$ Dy基态相同,但Dy-Dy耦合强度和磁化稳定性不同。我们表明,直接从精确的温度相关的磁化强度数据的准确性优于$1^{\circ}$的势垒$U_{FA}$和两个$4f$时刻之间的角度的幅度确定。实验发现的角度之间的$4f$时刻是在极好的协议与计算的角度之间的两个Dy离子的量子化轴。理论分析表明,Dy $_2$ TiC@C $_{80}$中Dy的磁矩取向从Dy键轴向中心离子偏离较大。这可以解释Dy $_2$ TiC@C $_{80}$中磁化稳定性较低的原因,尽管它表现出比Dy $_2$ ScN@C $_{80}$更强的交换耦合$\sim 49\%$。

英文摘要:

A key parameter for the low-temperature magnetic coupling of in dinuclear lanthanide single-molecule magnets (SMMs) is the barrier $U_{FA}$ resulting from the exchange and dipole interactions between the two $4f$ moments. Here we extend the pseudospin model previously used to describe the ground state of dinuclear endofullerenes to account for variations in the orientation of the single-ion anisotropy axes and apply it to the two SMMs Dy$_2$ScN@C$_{80}$ and Dy$_2$TiC@C$_{80}$. While x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) indicates the same $J_z=15/2$ Dy groundstate in both molecules, the Dy-Dy coupling strength and the stability of magnetization is distinct. We demonstrate that both the magnitude of the barrier $U_{FA}$ and the angle between the two $4f$ moments are determined directly from precise temperature-dependent magnetization data to an accuracy better than $1^{\circ}$. The experimentally found angles between the $4f$ moments are in excellent agreement with calculated angles between the quantisation axes of the two Dy ions. Theory indicates a larger deviation of the orientation of the Dy magnetic moments from the Dy bond axes to the central ion in Dy$_2$TiC@C$_{80}$. This may explain the lower stability of the magnetisation in Dy$_2$TiC@C$_{80}$, although it exhibits a $\sim 49\%$ stronger exchange coupling than in Dy$_2$ScN@C$_{80}$.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑