arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2107.04873stat.MEmath.STstat.TH

高维环境下多变量响应数据变量选择的EAS方法

The EAS approach to variable selection for multivariate response data in high-dimensional settings

Salil Koner, Jonathan P Williams

AI总结:

本文提出EAS模型选择方法,在高维相关预测变量或无稀疏性假设下通过广义fiducial分布进行组变量选择,并证明其强模型选择一致性,在模拟和酵母数据中验证了有效性。

摘要:

在本文中,我们提出了一种epsilon admissible subsets(EAS,ε容许子集)模型选择方法,用于在高维多变量回归环境中进行组变量选择。该EAS策略旨在相关预测变量和/或缺乏稀疏性假设的情况下,在一个简约模型类上估计一个类似后验的广义fiducial分布。为此,我们方法的有效性在模拟研究中得到了实证证明,并与其他最先进的模型/变量选择程序进行了比较。此外,在假设矩阵正态线性模型的情况下,我们证明如果确实存在一个稀疏的真实数据生成预测变量集,EAS策略在高维环境中能够实现强模型选择一致性。与贝叶斯模型选择方法相比,我们的广义fiducial方法完全避免了同时为模型参数指定任意先验分布和惩罚模型复杂性的问题;我们的方法允许直接对模型复杂性进行推断。通过酵母数据说明了该方法的实现,以识别重要的细胞周期调控转录因子。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we develop an {\em epsilon admissible subsets} (EAS) model selection approach for performing group variable selection in the high-dimensional multivariate regression setting. This EAS strategy is designed to estimate a posterior-like, generalized fiducial distribution over a parsimonious class of models in the setting of correlated predictors and/or in the absence of a sparsity assumption. The effectiveness of our approach, to this end, is demonstrated empirically in simulation studies, and is compared to other state-of-the-art model/variable selection procedures. Furthermore, assuming a matrix-Normal linear model we show that the EAS strategy achieves {\em strong model selection consistency} in the high-dimensional setting if there does exist a sparse, true data generating set of predictors. In contrast to Bayesian approaches for model selection, our generalized fiducial approach completely avoids the problem of simultaneously having to specify arbitrary prior distributions for model parameters and penalize model complexity; our approach allows for inference directly on the model complexity. \textcolor{black}{Implementation of the method is illustrated through yeast data to identify significant cell-cycle regulating transcription factors.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑