arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2103.14779math.OCstat.ML
收藏

使用灵敏度信息深度神经网络学习求解AC-OPF

Learning to Solve the AC-OPF using Sensitivity-Informed Deep Neural Networks

Manish K. Singh, Vassilis Kekatos, Georgios B. Giannakis

摘要:

为了将延迟关键电力系统应用中的计算负担从实时转移到离线,最近的工作考虑使用深度神经网络(DNN)来预测一旦呈现负载需求的AC最优潮流(AC-OPF)的解决方案的想法。由于网络拓扑可能会发生变化,因此必须以样本高效的方式训练DNN。为了提高数据效率,这项工作利用的事实OPF数据不是简单的训练标签,而是构成一个参数最优化问题的解决方案。因此,我们主张训练一个灵敏度通知DNN(SI-DNN),不仅匹配OPF优化器,而且匹配它们相对于OPF参数(负载)的偏导数。结果表明,所需的雅可比矩阵确实存在,在温和的条件下,可以很容易地计算从有关的原始/对偶解。所提出的SI-DNN与广泛的OPF求解器兼容,包括非凸二次约束二次规划(QCQP),其半定规划(SDP)松弛和MATPOWER;而SI-DNN可以无缝集成在其他学习OPF方案中。对三个基准电力系统的数值测试证实了SI-DNN在传统训练的DNN上预测的OPF解决方案的高级泛化和约束满足能力,特别是在低数据设置中。

英文摘要:

To shift the computational burden from real-time to offline in delay-critical power systems applications, recent works entertain the idea of using a deep neural network (DNN) to predict the solutions of the AC optimal power flow (AC-OPF) once presented load demands. As network topologies may change, training this DNN in a sample-efficient manner becomes a necessity. To improve data efficiency, this work utilizes the fact OPF data are not simple training labels, but constitute the solutions of a parametric optimization problem. We thus advocate training a sensitivity-informed DNN (SI-DNN) to match not only the OPF optimizers, but also their partial derivatives with respect to the OPF parameters (loads). It is shown that the required Jacobian matrices do exist under mild conditions, and can be readily computed from the related primal/dual solutions. The proposed SI-DNN is compatible with a broad range of OPF solvers, including a non-convex quadratically constrained quadratic program (QCQP), its semidefinite program (SDP) relaxation, and MATPOWER; while SI-DNN can be seamlessly integrated in other learning-to-OPF schemes. Numerical tests on three benchmark power systems corroborate the advanced generalization and constraint satisfaction capabilities for the OPF solutions predicted by an SI-DNN over a conventionally trained DNN, especially in low-data setups.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑