arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2102.04789cs.DL
收藏

通过出版商提供的元数据实现混合开放获取的透明度:一项Elsevier文章级研究

Transparency to hybrid open access through publisher-provided metadata: An article-level study of Elsevier

Najko Jahn, Lisa Matthias, Mikael Laakso

AI总结:

本研究利用Elsevier文章元数据首次从出版商层面分析了2015-2019年混合开放获取的采用与发票情况,揭示了混合OA增长缓慢、主要发票对象为作者,并证明了出版商元数据对提升学术出版透明度的价值。

摘要:

随着开放获取(OA)的发展,学术期刊出版中的资金流动日益复杂,但关于这些资金流动的全面数据和透明度仍然缺乏。这种不透明性在混合开放获取(hybrid OA)中尤为令人担忧,在混合开放获取模式下,基于订阅的期刊在作者支付可选费用后将单篇文章以OA形式出版。本研究通过利用Elsevier的文章元数据来应对透明度不足的问题,并首次从出版商层面研究了混合开放获取的采用情况和发票开具情况。我们的结果显示,从2015年到2019年,Elsevier的混合开放获取采用率稳步但缓慢增长,每年出版的混合OA文章数量翻了一番,Elsevier混合期刊中OA文章占所有文章的比例从2.6%增加到3.7%。此外,我们发现大多数混合OA文章的发票直接开具给作者,其次是通过与研究资助机构、机构或联盟达成的协议开具发票的文章,只有少数资助机构在推动混合OA的采用。因此,我们的发现指出了出版协议和OA政策在混合OA出版中的作用。我们的结果进一步证明了出版商提供的元数据通过将发票数据与文献计量学数据关联起来,在提高学术出版透明度方面的价值。

英文摘要:

With the growth of open access (OA), the financial flows in scholarly journal publishing have become increasingly complex, but comprehensive data and transparency into these flows are still lacking. The opaqueness is especially concerning for hybrid OA, where subscription-based journals publish individual articles as OA if an optional fee is paid. This study addresses the lack of transparency by leveraging Elsevier article metadata and provides the first publisher-level study of hybrid OA uptake and invoicing. Our results show that Elsevier's hybrid OA uptake has grown steadily but slowly from 2015-2019, doubling the number of hybrid OA articles published per year and increasing the share of OA articles in Elsevier's hybrid journals from 2.6% to 3.7% of all articles. Further, we find that most hybrid OA articles were invoiced directly to authors, followed by articles invoiced through agreements with research funders, institutions, or consortia, with only a few funding bodies driving hybrid OA uptake. As such, our findings point to the role of publishing agreements and OA policies in hybrid OA publishing. Our results further demonstrate the value of publisher-provided metadata to improve the transparency in scholarly publishing by linking invoicing data to bibliometrics.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑