arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2102.01091astro-ph.GA
收藏

应用Tüve-Weinberg方法于邻近星系:基于恒星质量的模式速度,以及与ISM动力学的比较

Applying the Tremaine-Weinberg Method to Nearby Galaxies: Stellar Mass-Based Pattern Speeds, and Comparisons with ISM Kinematics

Thomas G. Williams, Eva Schinnerer, Eric Emsellem, Sharon Meidt, Miguel Querejeta, Francesco Belfiore, Ivana Bešlić, Frank Bigiel, Mélanie Chevance, Daniel A. D… 展开作者

Thomas G. Williams, Eva Schinnerer, Eric Emsellem, Sharon Meidt, Miguel Querejeta, Francesco Belfiore, Ivana Bešlić, Frank Bigiel, Mélanie Chevance, Daniel A. Dale, Simon C. O. Glover, Kathryn Grasha, Ralf S. Klessen, J. M. Diederik Kruijssen, Adam K. Leroy, Hsi-An Pan, Jérôme Pety, Ismael Pessa, Erik Rosolowsky, Toshiki Saito, Francesco Santoro, Andreas Schruba, Mattia C. Sormani, Jiayi Sun, Elizabeth J. Watkins

摘要:

我们应用Tessee-Weinberg方法,19个附近的星系使用恒星质量表面密度和速度来自PHANGS-MUSE调查,计算(主要是酒吧)图案速度($Ω_{\rm P}$)。经过质量检查,我们发现这些基于恒星质量的测量中大约有一半(10)是可靠的。对于这些星系,我们发现我们的结果和以前公布的模式速度之间的良好协议,并使用旋转曲线来计算主要的共振位置(共旋转半径和Lindblad共振)。我们还比较了这些恒星质量导出的图案速度与H $α$(从MUSE)和CO($J=2{-}1$)从PHANGS-ALMA调查的排放。我们发现,在这些凝集素ISM示踪剂的情况下,这种方法错误地给出了一个信号,这是简单的角频率在一个代表性的半径设置由这些团块($Ω_{\rm clump}$)的分布,这$Ω_{\rm clump}$是显着不同的$Ω_{\rm P}$($\sim$ 20%的情况下H $α$,和$\sim$ 50%的情况下CO)。因此,我们得出结论,这是不可取的使用“模式速度”来自ISM运动学。最后,我们比较我们的推导模式的速度和共同旋转半径,以及酒吧的属性,这些星系的全球参数。与以往的研究结果一致,我们发现哈勃类型较晚的星系具有较大的共旋半径与棒长之比,分子气体含量较高的星系具有较高的$Ω_{\rm P}$,而膨胀主导型星系具有较低的$Ω_{\rm P}$ .然而,与早期的工作不同,在棒强度和$Ω_{\rm P}$之间没有明显的趋势,在总恒星质量表面密度和图案速度之间也没有明显的趋势。

英文摘要:

We apply the Tremaine-Weinberg method to 19 nearby galaxies using stellar mass surface densities and velocities derived from the PHANGS-MUSE survey, to calculate (primarily bar) pattern speeds ($Ω_{\rm P}$). After quality checks, we find that around half (10) of these stellar mass-based measurements are reliable. For those galaxies, we find good agreement between our results and previously published pattern speeds, and use rotation curves to calculate major resonance locations (co-rotation radii and Lindblad resonances). We also compare these stellar-mass derived pattern speeds with H$α$ (from MUSE) and CO($J=2{-}1$) emission from the PHANGS-ALMA survey. We find that in the case of these clumpy ISM tracers, this method erroneously gives a signal that is simply the angular frequency at a representative radius set by the distribution of these clumps ($Ω_{\rm clump}$), and that this $Ω_{\rm clump}$ is significantly different to $Ω_{\rm P}$ ($\sim$20% in the case of H$α$, and $\sim$50% in the case of CO). Thus, we conclude that it is inadvisable to use "pattern speeds" derived from ISM kinematics. Finally, we compare our derived pattern speeds and co-rotation radii, along with bar properties, to the global parameters of these galaxies. Consistent with previous studies, we find that galaxies with a later Hubble type have a larger ratio of co-rotation radius to bar length, more molecular-gas rich galaxies have higher $Ω_{\rm P}$, and more bulge-dominated galaxies have lower $Ω_{\rm P}$. Unlike earlier works, however, there are no clear trends between the bar strength and $Ω_{\rm P}$, nor between the total stellar mass surface density and the pattern speed.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑