arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2102.00359physics.soc-phcond-mat.dis-nnnlin.AOq-bio.PE
收藏

互动博弈中合作的涌现路径:动态互惠

Emergent route towards cooperation in interacting games: the dynamical reciprocity

Qinqin Wang, Rizhou Liang, Jiqiang Zhang, Guozhong Zheng, Lin Ma, Li Chen

摘要:

现代文明的成功是建立在人类社会广泛合作的基础上的,几个世纪以来,破译背后的机制一直是一个主要目标。然而,一个关键的事实是,在大多数先前的研究中,现实世界中的游戏通常是同时和交互式的,而不是像假设的那样单独进行。在这里,我们介绍了互动游戏的想法,不同的游戏共同进化和影响对方的决策。我们发现,作为游戏的游戏互动变得重要,合作相变显着改善,一个相当高的合作水平达到了所有参与的游戏时,互动变得很强。平均场论指出,一种新的机制-- \emph{the dynamical reciprocity},作为著名的网络互惠性的对应物,正在起促进合作的作用,详细的分析证实了这一点。这种互惠性对博弈类型、种群结构和更新规则等的变化具有鲁棒性,并且更多的博弈通常会产生更高的合作水平。我们的研究结果指出,在现实世界中,许多问题相互交织,存在着高度合作的巨大潜力,即使在极端不利的情况下,也有可能维持体面的合作。

英文摘要:

The success of modern civilization is built upon widespread cooperation in human society, deciphering the mechanisms behind has being a major goal for centuries. A crucial fact is, however, largely missing in most prior studies that games in the real world are typically played simultaneously and interactively rather than separately as assumed. Here we introduce the idea of interacting games that different games coevolve and influence each other's decision-making. We show that as the game-game interaction becomes important, the cooperation phase transition dramatically improves, a fairly high level of cooperation is reached for all involved games when interaction goes to be strong. A mean-field theory indicates that a new mechanism -- \emph{the dynamical reciprocity}, as a counterpart to the well-known network reciprocity, is at work to foster cooperation, which is confirmed by the detailed analysis. This revealed reciprocity is robust against variations in the game type, the population structure, and the updating rules etc, and more games generally yield a higher level of cooperation. Our findings point out the great potential towards high cooperation for many issues are interwoven with each other in the real world, and also the possibility of sustaining decent cooperation even in extremely adverse circumstances.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑