This paper targets the automated extraction of components of argumentative information and their relations from natural language text. Moreover, we address a current lack of systems to provide complete argumentative structure from arbitrary natural language text for general usage. We present an argument mining pipeline as a universally applicable approach for transforming German and English language texts to graph-based argument representations. We also introduce new methods for evaluating the results based on existing benchmark argument structures. Our results show that the generated argument graphs can be beneficial to detect new connections between different statements of an argumentative text. Our pipeline implementation is publicly available on GitHub.
The growing interest in argument mining and computational argumentation brings with it a plethora of Natural Language Understanding (NLU) tasks and corresponding datasets. However, as with many other NLU tasks, the dominant language is English, with resources in other languages being few and far between. In this work, we explore the potential of transfer learning using the multilingual BERT model to address argument mining tasks in non-English languages, based on English datasets and the use of machine translation. We show that such methods are well suited for classifying the stance of argumen…
University of Bologna（博洛尼亚大学）；University of Modena and Reggio Emilia（摩德纳-雷焦艾米利亚大学）
We propose a novel architecture for Graph Neural Networks that is inspired by the idea behind Tree Kernels of measuring similarity between trees by taking into account their common substructures, named fragments. By imposing a series of regularization constraints to the learning problem, we exploit a pooling mechanism that incorporates such notion of fragments within the node soft assignment function that produces the embeddings. We present an extensive experimental evaluation on a collection of sentence classification tasks conducted on several argument mining corpora, showing that the propos…
Argument mining automatically identifies and extracts the structure of inference and reasoning conveyed in natural language arguments. To the best of our knowledge, most of the state-of-the-art works in this field have focused on using tree-like structures and linguistic modeling. But, these approaches are not able to model more complex structures which are often found in online forums and real world argumentation structures. In this paper, a novel methodology for argument mining is proposed which employs attention-based embeddings for link prediction to model the causational hierarchies in ty…
Argumentation is a type of discourse where speakers try to persuade their audience about the reasonableness of a claim by presenting supportive arguments. Most work in argument mining has focused on modeling arguments in monologues. We propose a computational model for argument mining in online persuasive discussion forums that brings together the micro-level (argument as product) and macro-level (argument as process) models of argumentation. Fundamentally, this approach relies on identifying relations between components of arguments in a discussion thread. Our approach for relation prediction…
Imperial College London（帝国理工学院）；CNRS（法国国家科学研究中心）；Inria（法国国家信息与自动化研究所）；I3S（信息、信号与智能系统实验室）
Argument Mining is the research area which aims at extracting argument components and predicting argumentative relations (i.e.,support and attack) from text. In particular, numerous approaches have been proposed in the literature to predict the relations holding between the arguments, and application-specific annotated resources were built for this purpose. Despite the fact that these resources have been created to experiment on the same task, the definition of a single relation prediction method to be successfully applied to a significant portion of these datasets is an open research problem …
OpenDebateEvidence: A Massive-Scale Argument Mining and Summarization Dataset
Howard Community College（霍华德社区学院）；UC Berkeley（加州大学伯克利分校）；University of New South Wales（新南威尔士大学）；Stanford University（斯坦福大学）；Oracle Corporation（甲骨文公司）；University of Texas（德克萨斯大学）；New York University（纽约大学）
Database Systems and Data Mining, LMU Munich（慕尼黑大学数据库系统与数据研究所）；LMU Munich（慕尼黑大学）
Peer reviewing is a central process in modern research and essential for ensuring high quality and reliability of published work. At the same time, it is a time-consuming process and increasing interest in emerging fields often results in a high review workload, especially for senior researchers in this area. How to cope with this problem is an open question and it is vividly discussed across all major conferences. In this work, we propose an Argument Mining based approach for the assistance of editors, meta-reviewers, and reviewers. We demonstrate that the decision process in the field of sci…
In this work we address the problem of argument search. The purpose of argument search is the distillation of pro and contra arguments for requested topics from large text corpora. In previous works, the usual approach is to use a standard search engine to extract text parts which are relevant to the given topic and subsequently use an argument recognition algorithm to select arguments from them. The main challenge in the argument recognition task, which is also known as argument mining, is that often sentences containing arguments are structurally similar to purely informative sentences witho…
Université de Montréal（蒙特利尔大学）；Carnegie Mellon University（卡内基梅隆大学）；Hofstra University（霍夫斯特拉大学）；University of Pittsburgh（匹兹堡大学）
We propose an adaptive environment (CABINET) to support caselaw analysis (identifying key argument elements) based on a novel cognitive computing framework that carefully matches various machine learning (ML) capabilities to the proficiency of a user. CABINET supports law students in their learning as well as professionals in their work. The results of our experiments focused on the feasibility of the proposed framework are promising. We show that the system is capable of identifying a potential error in the analysis with very low false positives rate (2.0-3.5%), as well as of predicting the k…
In this paper, we explore legal argument mining using multiple levels of granularity. Argument mining has usually been conceptualized as a sentence classification problem. In this work, we conceptualize argument mining as a token-level (i.e., word-level) classification problem. We use a Longformer model to classify the tokens. Results show that token-level text classification identifies certain legal argument elements more accurately than sentence-level text classification. Token-level classification also provides greater flexibility to analyze legal texts and to gain more insight into what th…
A challenging task when generating summaries of legal documents is the ability to address their argumentative nature. We introduce a simple technique to capture the argumentative structure of legal documents by integrating argument role labeling into the summarization process. Experiments with pretrained language models show that our proposed approach improves performance over strong baselines
Identifying argument components from unstructured texts and predicting the relationships expressed among them are two primary steps of argument mining. The intrinsic complexity of these tasks demands powerful learning models. While pretrained Transformer-based Language Models (LM) have been shown to provide state-of-the-art results over different NLP tasks, the scarcity of manually annotated data and the highly domain-dependent nature of argumentation restrict the capabilities of such models. In this work, we propose a novel transfer learning strategy to overcome these challenges. We utilize a…
In the medical domain, the continuous stream of scientific research contains contradictory results supported by arguments and counter-arguments. As medical expertise occurs at different levels, part of the human agents have difficulties to face the huge amount of studies, but also to understand the reasons and pieces of evidences claimed by the proponents and the opponents of the debated topic. To better understand the supporting arguments for new findings related to current state of the art in the medical domain we need tools able to identify arguments in scientific papers. Our work here aims…
University College Dublin（都柏林大学学院）；Birkbeck, University of London（伦敦大学伯贝克学院）
The contextual word embedding model, BERT, has proved its ability on downstream tasks with limited quantities of annotated data. BERT and its variants help to reduce the burden of complex annotation work in many interdisciplinary research areas, for example, legal argument mining in digital humanities. Argument mining aims to develop text analysis tools that can automatically retrieve arguments and identify relationships between argumentation clauses. Since argumentation is one of the key aspects of case law, argument mining tools for legal texts are applicable to both academic and non-academi…
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich（慕尼黑大学）；Center for Information and Language Processing（信息与语言处理中心）
Computational Argumentation in general and Argument Mining in particular are important research fields. In previous works, many of the challenges to automatically extract and to some degree reason over natural language arguments were addressed. The tools to extract argument units are increasingly available and further open problems can be addressed. In this work, we are presenting the task of Aspect-Based Argument Mining (ABAM), with the essential subtasks of Aspect Term Extraction (ATE) and Nested Segmentation (NS). At the first instance, we create and release an annotated corpus with aspect …
One of the main tasks in argument mining is the retrieval of argumentative content pertaining to a given topic. Most previous work addressed this task by retrieving a relatively small number of relevant documents as the initial source for such content. This line of research yielded moderate success, which is of limited use in a real-world system. Furthermore, for such a system to yield a comprehensive set of relevant arguments, over a wide range of topics, it requires leveraging a large and diverse corpus in an appropriate manner. Here we present a first end-to-end high-precision, corpus-wide …
We propose a novel factor graph model for argument mining, designed for settings in which the argumentative relations in a document do not necessarily form a tree structure. (This is the case in over 20% of the web comments dataset we release.) Our model jointly learns elementary unit type classification and argumentative relation prediction. Moreover, our model supports SVM and RNN parametrizations, can enforce structure constraints (e.g., transitivity), and can express dependencies between adjacent relations and propositions. Our approaches outperform unstructured baselines in both web comme…
Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab (UKP-TUDA)（普适知识处理实验室（UKP-TUDA））；Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt（达姆施塔特工业大学计算机科学系）；www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de（无（该网址非机构））
Argument mining is a core technology for automating argument search in large document collections. Despite its usefulness for this task, most current approaches to argument mining are designed for use only with specific text types and fall short when applied to heterogeneous texts. In this paper, we propose a new sentential annotation scheme that is reliably applicable by crowd workers to arbitrary Web texts. We source annotations for over 25,000 instances covering eight controversial topics. The results of cross-topic experiments show that our attention-based neural network generalizes best t…
Inferring commonsense knowledge is a key challenge in natural language processing, but due to the sparsity of training data, previous work has shown that supervised methods for commonsense knowledge mining underperform when evaluated on novel data. In this work, we develop a method for generating commonsense knowledge using a large, pre-trained bidirectional language model. By transforming relational triples into masked sentences, we can use this model to rank a triple's validity by the estimated pointwise mutual information between the two entities. Since we do not update the weights of the b…
Center for Information and Language Processing (CIS)（信息与语言处理中心（CIS））；Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU)（路德维希·马克西米利安大学（LMU））
Despite considerable recent progress, the creation of well-balanced and diverse resources remains a time-consuming and costly challenge in Argument Mining. Active Learning reduces the amount of data necessary for the training of machine learning models by querying the most informative samples for annotation and therefore is a promising method for resource creation. In a large scale comparison of several Active Learning methods, we show that Active Learning considerably decreases the effort necessary to get good deep learning performance on the task of Argument Unit Recognition and Classificati…
LLMs for Argument Mining: Detection, Extraction, and Relationship Classification of pre-defined Arguments in Online Comments
School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne（墨尔本大学计算与信息系统学院）；Language Technologies Institute, Carnegie Mellon University（卡内基梅隆大学语言技术研究所）
Exploration of Marker-Based Approaches in Argument Mining through Augmented Natural Language
Applied Machine Learning (AMaL) Lab（应用机器学习（AMaL）实验室）；Department of Computer Science and Engineering（计算机科学与工程系）；Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Guwahati, India（印度理工学院（IIT）果阿分校，印度）
Vyatka State University（维亚特卡国立大学）；ITMO University（ITMO大学）
Argumentation mining is a field of computational linguistics that is devoted to extracting from texts and classifying arguments and relations between them, as well as constructing an argumentative structure. A significant obstacle to research in this area for the Russian language is the lack of annotated Russian-language text corpora. This article explores the possibility of improving the quality of argumentation mining using the extension of the Russian-language version of the Argumentative Microtext Corpus (ArgMicro) based on the machine translation of the Persuasive Essays Corpus (PersEssay…
Argumentation is one of society's foundational pillars, and, sparked by advances in NLP and the vast availability of text data, automated mining of arguments receives increasing attention. A decisive property of arguments is their strength or quality. While there are works on the automated estimation of argument strength, their scope is narrow: they focus on isolated datasets and neglect the interactions with related argument mining tasks, such as argument identification, evidence detection, or emotional appeal. In this work, we close this gap by approaching argument quality estimation from mu…
End-to-End Argument Mining through Autoregressive Argumentative Structure Prediction
Applied Machine Learning (AMaL) Lab（应用机器学习（AMaL）实验室）；Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Guwahati, India（计算机科学与工程系，印度理工学院（IIT），古瓦哈蒂，印度）；North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology (NERIST), Arunachal Pradesh, India（北东部科学与技术研究所（NERIST），阿鲁纳恰尔邦，印度）
提出 AASP 自回归框架，以条件预训练语言模型和受约束动作逐步生成论证结构，端到端联合完成论证挖掘，并在三个标准基准上验证其 SoTA 性能。
Khoury College of Computer Sciences（Khoury计算机科学学院）；Northeastern University（东北大学）
Peer-review plays a critical role in the scientific writing and publication ecosystem. To assess the efficiency and efficacy of the reviewing process, one essential element is to understand and evaluate the reviews themselves. In this work, we study the content and structure of peer reviews under the argument mining framework, through automatically detecting (1) argumentative propositions put forward by reviewers, and (2) their types (e.g., evaluating the work or making suggestions for improvement). We first collect 14.2K reviews from major machine learning and natural language processing venu…
One of the major goals in automated argumentation mining is to uncover the argument structure present in argumentative text. In order to determine this structure, one must understand how different individual components of the overall argument are linked. General consensus in this field dictates that the argument components form a hierarchy of persuasion, which manifests itself in a tree structure. This work provides the first neural network-based approach to argumentation mining, focusing on the two tasks of extracting links between argument components, and classifying types of argument compon…
German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)（德国人工智能研究中心）；University of Potsdam（波茨坦大学）
Scholarly Argumentation Mining (SAM) has recently gained attention due to its potential to help scholars with the rapid growth of published scientific literature. It comprises two subtasks: argumentative discourse unit recognition (ADUR) and argumentative relation extraction (ARE), both of which are challenging since they require e.g. the integration of domain knowledge, the detection of implicit statements, and the disambiguation of argument structure. While previous work focused on dataset construction and baseline methods for specific document sections, such as abstract or results, full-tex…
DAMO Academy, Alibaba Group（阿里巴巴集团达摩院）；Singapore University of Technology and Design（新加坡科技设计大学）；The Chinese University of Hong Kong（香港中文大学）；National University of Singapore（新加坡国立大学）
Traditionally, a debate usually requires a manual preparation process, including reading plenty of articles, selecting the claims, identifying the stances of the claims, seeking the evidence for the claims, etc. As the AI debate attracts more attention these years, it is worth exploring the methods to automate the tedious process involved in the debating system. In this work, we introduce a comprehensive and large dataset named IAM, which can be applied to a series of argument mining tasks, including claim extraction, stance classification, evidence extraction, etc. Our dataset is collected fr…
Improving Synthetic Data Generation for Argument Mining via Adversarial Reinforcement Learning
College of Applied Science, Shenzhen University（深圳大学应用科学学院）；School of Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen Technology University（深圳技术大学人工智能学院）；Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen)（哈尔滨工业大学（深圳））；The Chinese University of Hong Kong（香港中文大学）；Pengcheng Laboratory（鹏城实验室）
Cross-Genre Argument Mining: Can Language Models Automatically Fill in Missing Discourse Markers?
Laboratório de Inteligência Artificial e Ciência de Computadores (LIACC)（人工智能与计算机科学实验室（LIACC））；Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto（波尔图大学工程学院）；Natural Language Learning Group (NLLG)（自然语言学习组（NLLG））；Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University（比勒费尔德大学技术学院）
Vyatka State University（维亚特卡国立大学）；Lomonosov Moscow State University（罗蒙诺索夫莫斯科国立大学）；Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology（斯科尔科沃科学技术研究院）
Argumentation analysis is a field of computational linguistics that studies methods for extracting arguments from texts and the relationships between them, as well as building argumentation structure of texts. This paper is a report of the organizers on the first competition of argumentation analysis systems dealing with Russian language texts within the framework of the Dialogue conference. During the competition, the participants were offered two tasks: stance detection and argument classification. A corpus containing 9,550 sentences (comments on social media posts) on three topics related t…
Universidade de São Paulo Center for Artificial Intelligence (C4AI)（圣保罗大学人工智能中心（C4AI））；Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia Núcleo de Sistemas Eletrônicos Embarcados (NSEE)（马乌阿技术研究所电子系统嵌入核（NSEE））
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology（东京农工大学）
Argument Mining (AM) is a relatively recent discipline, which concentrates on extracting claims or premises from discourses, and inferring their structures. However, many existing works do not consider micro-level AM studies on discussion threads sufficiently. In this paper, we tackle AM for discussion threads. Our main contributions are follows: (1) A novel combination scheme focusing on micro-level inner- and inter- post schemes for a discussion thread. (2) Annotation of large-scale civic discussion threads with the scheme. (3) Parallel constrained pointer architecture (PCPA), a novel end-to…
Valencian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence（瓦伦西亚人工智能研究院）；Universitat Politècnica de València（瓦伦西亚理工大学）
The rVRAIN team tackled the Budget Argument Mining (BAM) task, consisting of a combination of classification and information retrieval sub-tasks. For the argument classification (AC), the team achieved its best performing results with a five-class BERT-based cascade model complemented with some handcrafted rules. The rules were used to determine if the expression was monetary or not. Then, each monetary expression was classified as a premise or as a conclusion in the first level of the cascade model. Finally, each premise was classified into the three premise classes, and each conclusion into …
University of Oregon（俄勒冈大学）；Texas A&M University（德克萨斯农工大学）
Prior work in Argument Mining frequently alludes to its potential applications in automatic debating systems. Despite this focus, almost no datasets or models exist which apply natural language processing techniques to problems found within competitive formal debate. To remedy this, we present the DebateSum dataset. DebateSum consists of 187,386 unique pieces of evidence with corresponding argument and extractive summaries. DebateSum was made using data compiled by competitors within the National Speech and Debate Association over a 7-year period. We train several transformer summarization mod…
Engaging in a live debate requires, among other things, the ability to effectively rebut arguments claimed by your opponent. In particular, this requires identifying these arguments. Here, we suggest doing so by automatically mining claims from a corpus of news articles containing billions of sentences, and searching for them in a given speech. This raises the question of whether such claims indeed correspond to those made in spoken speeches. To this end, we collected a large dataset of $400$ speeches in English discussing $200$ controversial topics, mined claims for each topic, and asked anno…
