arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1607.08074cs.AIcs.CL

Mining Arguments from Cancer Documents Using Natural Language Processing and Ontologies

Technical University of Cluj-Napoca(克卢日-纳波卡技术大学)

Adrian Groza, Oana Popa

英文摘要:

In the medical domain, the continuous stream of scientific research contains contradictory results supported by arguments and counter-arguments. As medical expertise occurs at different levels, part of the human agents have difficulties to face the huge amount of studies, but also to understand the reasons and pieces of evidences claimed by the proponents and the opponents of the debated topic. To better understand the supporting arguments for new findings related to current state of the art in the medical domain we need tools able to identify arguments in scientific papers. Our work here aims to fill the above technological gap. Quite aware of the difficulty of this task, we embark to this road by relying on the well-known interleaving of domain knowledge with natural language processing. To formalise the existing medical knowledge, we rely on ontologies. To structure the argumentation model we use also the expressivity and reasoning capabilities of Description Logics. To perform argumentation mining we formalise various linguistic patterns in a rule-based language. We tested our solution against a corpus of scientific papers related to breast cancer. The run experiments show a F-measure between 0.71 and 0.86 for identifying conclusions of an argument and between 0.65 and 0.86 for identifying premises of an argument.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑