arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2006.00872math.NAcs.NA
收藏

一般区域上Poisson问题的移动边界法分析

Analysis of the Shifted Boundary Method for the Poisson Problem in General Domains

Nabil M. Atallah, Claudio Canuto, Guglielmo Scovazzi

摘要:

移动边界法(SBM)是求解边值问题的一种近似区域方法,属于非拟合/嵌入/浸入方法的一个较广泛的类别。它已被证明是相当有效的处理问题的复杂几何形状,从泊松到达西,从纳维尔-斯托克斯弹性和超越。SBM的关键特征是应用狄利克雷边界条件的位置中的{ \it移位}-从真边界到代理边界-以及边界条件值的适当修改(再次,{ \it移位}),以减少一致性误差。在本文中,我们提供了一个良好的分析方法在光滑和非光滑域,突出的几何形状和精确和代理边界之间的距离的影响后的收敛速度。在不失一般性的情况下,我们认为泊松问题的Dirichlet边界条件作为一个模型,我们首先详细的程序,以获得关键的替代品和真实的边界之间的转移。其次,我们给出了离散问题的适定性和稳定性的一个充分条件。对于光滑边界和具有角和边的边界,深入分析了由边界条件移动引起的一致性误差的行为。收敛速度被证明是最佳的能量范数,并进一步提高了$L^2$ -范数。

英文摘要:

The shifted boundary method (SBM) is an approximate domain method for boundary value problems, in the broader class of unfitted/embedded/immersed methods. It has proven to be quite efficient in handling problems with complex geometries, ranging from Poisson to Darcy, from Navier-Stokes to elasticity and beyond. The key feature of the SBM is a {\it shift} in the location where Dirichlet boundary conditions are applied - from the true to a surrogate boundary - and an appropriate modification (again, a {\it shift}) of the value of the boundary conditions, in order to reduce the consistency error. In this paper we provide a sound analysis of the method in smooth and non-smooth domains, highlighting the influence of geometry and distance between exact and surrogate boundaries upon the convergence rate. Without loss of generality, we consider the Poisson problem with Dirichlet boundary conditions as a model and we first detail a procedure to obtain the crucial shifting between the surrogate and the true boundaries. Next, we give a sufficient condition for the well-posedness and stability of the discrete problem. The behavior of the consistency error arising from shifting the boundary conditions is thoroughly analyzed, for smooth boundaries and for boundaries with corners and edges. The convergence rate is proven to be optimal in the energy norm, and is further enhanced in the $L^2$-norm.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑