arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2004.07854astro-ph.CO
收藏

SCORCH。III。具有不同聚集因子的再电离解析模型

SCORCH. III. Analytical Models of Reionization with Varying Clumping Factors

Nianyi Chen, Aristide Doussot, Hy Trac, Renyue Cen

摘要:

在宇宙氢再电离的模拟和构造(SCORCH)项目中,我们比较了氢电离分数的解析模型与辐射流体动力学模拟。我们推导出的质量加权氢电离分数的分析模型,从当地的电离平衡方程作为一个更准确的替代广泛采用的模型的基础上的体积填充因子。特别是,我们的模型有一个复合项平方的电离分数,这是一致的两体相互作用性质的重组。然后,我们使用辐射流体动力学模拟来研究所需的丛生因子来求解解析方程,并提供准确的拟合函数。我们发现,从我们的辐射转移模拟电离氢聚集因子是显着不同的那些从其他模拟使用一个统一的光电离背景。除了红移的依赖性,我们还看到电离氢聚集因子对电离分数的依赖性,我们将其纳入我们的拟合。我们使用我们的分析模型和聚集因子计算了再电离历史,并与广泛采用的模型进行了比较,我们所有的模型都达到了$<7\%$与模拟结果的差异,而其他模型都有$>20\%$偏差。由我们的解析模型计算的再电离汤姆逊光学深度与模拟结果存在$<5\%$偏差,而以前的解析模型在IGM再电离方面存在$>20\%$偏差,可能导致IGM再电离的结论有偏差。

英文摘要:

In the Simulations and Constructions of the Reionization of Cosmic Hydrogen (SCORCH) project, we compare analytical models of the hydrogen ionization fraction with radiation-hydrodynamic simulations. We derive analytical models of the mass-weighted hydrogen ionization fraction from the local ionization balance equations as a more accurate alternative to the widely adopted model based on the volume filling factor. In particular, our model has a recombination term quadratic in the ionization fraction, which is consistent with the two-body interaction nature of recombination. Then, we use the radiation-hydrodynamic simulations to study the clumping factors needed to solve the analytical equations, and provide accurate fitting functions. We find that the ionized hydrogen clumping factors from our radiative transfer simulations are significantly different than those from other simulations that use a uniform photoionization background. In addition to redshift dependence, we also see the dependence of ionized hydrogen clumping factor on ionization fraction, and we incorporate this into our fits. We calculate the reionization histories using our analytical models and clumping factors and compare with widely adopted models, and all of our models achieve $<7\%$ difference from simulation results while the other models have $>20\%$ deviations. The Thomson optical depths from reionization calculated from our analytical models result in $<5\%$ deviation from simulations, while the previous analytical models have $>20\%$ difference in and could result in biased conclusions of the IGM reionization.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑