arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.02726physics.flu-dynphysics.space-ph
收藏

可压缩流体动力学turbulence中的动能级联

On cascade of kinetic energy in compressible hydrodynamic turbulence

Petr Hellinger, Andrea Verdini, Simone Landi, Luca Franci, Emanuele Papini, Lorenzo Matteini

摘要:

采用直接数值模拟方法,对中等雷诺数和初始马赫数$M=1$的三维流体动力衰减湍流进行了数值模拟,研究了动能湍流叶栅的特性。可压缩和不可压缩版本的卡门-豪沃思-莫宁(KHM)和低通滤波/粗粒度的方法进行了比较。在模拟中,总能量是很好的守恒;尺度相关的KHM和粗粒度的能量方程也是很好的守恒;这两种方法显示出类似的结果,系统没有一个惯性范围的级联的动能,该级联占主导地位的区域也有不可忽略的贡献的动能衰减,耗散和压力膨胀效应。虽然这两种方法给出了半定量相似的结果的动能级联,耗散和压力膨胀率,它们不同的增量分离和过滤尺度,这些尺度不是简单的相关。这两种方法可用于确定惯性范围和确定动能的级联/耗散率。

英文摘要:

Properties of the turbulent cascade of kinetic energy are studied using direct numerical simulations of three-dimensional hydrodynamic decaying turbulence with a moderate Reynolds number and the initial Mach number $M=1$. Compressible and incompressible versions of the Karman-Howarth-Monin (KHM) and low-pass filtering/coarse-graining approaches are compared. In the simulation the total energy is well conserved; the scale dependent KHM and coarse-grained energy equations are also well conserved; the two approaches show similar results, the system does not have an inertial range for the cascade of kinetic energy, the region where this cascade dominates also have a non-negligible contribution of the kinetic-energy decay, dissipation, and pressure-dilatation effects. While the two approaches give semi-quantitatively similar results for the kinetic energy cascade, dissipation and pressure-dilatation rates, they differ in the increment separation and filtering scales; these scales are not simply related. The two approaches may be used to find the inertial range and to determine the cascade/dissipation rate of the kinetic energy.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑