arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2004.02043eess.IVcs.LGstat.ML

LU-Net: a multi-task network to improve the robustness of segmentation of left ventriclular structures by deep learning in 2D echocardiography

Univ Lyon(里昂大学);INSA-Lyon(里昂国立应用科学学院);Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1(里昂第一大学克洛德·贝尔纳大学);UJM-Saint Etienne(圣艾蒂安大学);CNRS(法国国家科学研究中心);Inserm(法国国家健康与医学研究院);Norwegian University of Science and Technology(挪威科技大学);Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Etienne(圣艾蒂安中心医院);St. Olavs Hospital(圣奥拉夫医院);University of Sherbrooke(舍布鲁克大学)
Sarah Leclerc, Erik Smistad, Andreas Østvik, Frederic Cervenansky, Florian Espinosa, Torvald Espeland, Erik Andreas Rye Berg, Thomas Grenier, Carole Lartizien, … 展开作者

Sarah Leclerc, Erik Smistad, Andreas Østvik, Frederic Cervenansky, Florian Espinosa, Torvald Espeland, Erik Andreas Rye Berg, Thomas Grenier, Carole Lartizien, Pierre-Marc Jodoin, Lasse Lovstakken, Olivier Bernard

英文摘要:

Segmentation of cardiac structures is one of the fundamental steps to estimate volumetric indices of the heart. This step is still performed semi-automatically in clinical routine, and is thus prone to inter- and intra-observer variability. Recent studies have shown that deep learning has the potential to perform fully automatic segmentation. However, the current best solutions still suffer from a lack of robustness. In this work, we introduce an end-to-end multi-task network designed to improve the overall accuracy of cardiac segmentation while enhancing the estimation of clinical indices and reducing the number of outliers. Results obtained on a large open access dataset show that our method outperforms the current best performing deep learning solution and achieved an overall segmentation accuracy lower than the intra-observer variability for the epicardial border (i.e. on average a mean absolute error of 1.5mm and a Hausdorff distance of 5.1mm) with 11% of outliers. Moreover, we demonstrate that our method can closely reproduce the expert analysis for the end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volumes, with a mean correlation of 0.96 and a mean absolute error of 7.6ml. Concerning the ejection fraction of the left ventricle, results are more contrasted with a mean correlation coefficient of 0.83 and an absolute mean error of 5.0%, producing scores that are slightly below the intra-observer margin. Based on this observation, areas for improvement are suggested.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑