arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.06088physics.chem-ph
收藏

$O(N^6)$微扰修正对反旋CCSD的显著精确性:耦合团簇中化学精确度需要三倍吗?

The remarkable accuracy of an $O(N^6)$ perturbative correction to opposite-spin CCSD: are triples necessary for chemical accuracy in coupled cluster?

David W. Small

摘要:

本工作的重点是OS-CCSD-SPT(2),它是对相反自旋耦合团簇单双的二阶相似变换微扰理论修正,其中后者去掉了同自旋振幅,自洽地求解了相反自旋振幅。我们证明,对于非多参考分子,OS-CCSD-SPT(2)产生的相对能量与高阶方法(如CCSD(T))的准确性相当。例如,使用参考文献中的PBE 0轨道,OS-CCSD-SPT(2)相对于CCSD(2)W 4 -08原子化能量的非多参考子集基准值的平均绝对偏差(MAD)为0.66 kcal/mol。a对于CCSD,MAD > 6 kcal/mol)。OS-CCSD-SPT(2)没有经验参数,具有$O(N^6)$的固有标度,并且不使用三元组。它也自然地服从于更高阶的校正:相关的三阶校正,OS-CCSD-SPT(3),它确实涉及连接的三重和四重,对相同的基准表现出0.44 kcal/mol的MAD。

英文摘要:

The focus of this work is OS-CCSD-SPT(2), which is a second-order similarity transformed perturbation theory correction to opposite spin coupled cluster singles doubles, where in the latter the same-spin amplitudes are removed and the opposite-spin ones are solved self consistently. We demonstrate that, for non-multireference molecules, OS-CCSD-SPT(2) produces relative energies that rival the accuracy of higher-order methods like CCSD(T). For example, using PBE0 orbitals in the reference, OS-CCSD-SPT(2) exhibits a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of 0.66 kcal/mol with respect to CCSD(2) benchmark values for the non-multireference subset of W4-08 atomization energies (c.f. a MAD > 6 kcal/mol for CCSD). OS-CCSD-SPT(2) is free of empirical parameters, has an instrinsic scaling of $O(N^6)$, and makes no use of triples. It is also naturally amenable to higher order corrections: the associated third-order correction, OS-CCSD-SPT(3), which does involve connected triples and quadruples, exhibits a MAD of 0.44 kcal/mol for the same benchmark.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑