arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2001.03787eess.SYcs.SY
收藏

利用矢量观测确定和估计姿态:回顾、挑战和比较结果

Attitude Determination and Estimation using Vector Observations: Review, Challenges and Comparative Results

Hashim A Hashim

摘要:

本文研究的是姿态确定和估计问题。早期的应用程序认为代数方法的姿态确定。姿态确定算法被高斯姿态估计滤波器(在商业应用中继续广泛使用)所取代。然而,高斯姿态滤波器对测量噪声的敏感性促使引入非线性姿态滤波器,该非线性姿态滤波器考虑姿态动力学问题的非线性性质,并允许更简单的滤波器推导。本文介绍了几种类型的姿态确定和估计算法。每一类都详细说明,并以连续和离散的形式与文献的例子说明。这些算法之间的比较表明,通过仿真结果的瞬态和稳态误差。比较的补充是统计分析的误差相关的平均值,无穷范数,和标准偏差的每个算法在稳态。保留字:比较研究,姿态,确定,估计,滤波器,自适应滤波器,高斯滤波器,非线性滤波器,概述,回顾,罗德里格斯向量,特殊正交群,单位四元数,角轴,确定性,随机,连续,离散,乘法扩展卡尔曼滤波器,KF,EKF,MEKF,白噪声,有色噪声。

英文摘要:

This paper concerns the problem of attitude determination and estimation. The early applications considered algebraic methods of attitude determination. Attitude determination algorithms were supplanted by the Gaussian attitude estimation filters (which continue to be widely used in commercial applications). However, the sensitivity of the Gaussian attitude filter to the measurement noise prompted the introduction of the nonlinear attitude filters which account for the nonlinear nature of the attitude dynamics problem and allow for a simpler filter derivation. This paper presents a survey of several types of attitude determination and estimation algorithms. Each category is detailed and illustrated with literature examples in both continuous and discrete form. A comparison between these algorithms is demonstrated in terms of transient and steady-state error through simulation results. The comparison is supplemented by statistical analysis of the error-related mean, infinity norm, and standard deviation of each algorithm in the steady-state. Keywords: Comparative Study, Attitude, Determination, Estimation, Filter, Adaptive Filter, Gaussian Filter, Nonlinear Filter, Overview, Review, Rodrigues Vector, Special Orthogonal Group, Unit-quaternion, Angle-axis, Determinstic, Stochastic, Continuous, Discrete, Multiplicative extended kalman filter, KF, EKF, MEKF, white noise, colored noise.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑