arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1907.04869astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA
收藏

H0LiCOW XIII。透镜类星体中$H_{0}$的2.4%测量:早期和晚期宇宙探测器之间的$5.3σ$张力

H0LiCOW XIII. A 2.4% measurement of $H_{0}$ from lensed quasars: $5.3σ$ tension between early and late-Universe probes

Kenneth C. Wong, Sherry H. Suyu, Geoff C. -F. Chen, Cristian E. Rusu, Martin Millon, Dominique Sluse, Vivien Bonvin, Christopher D. Fassnacht, Stefan Taubenberg… 展开作者

Kenneth C. Wong, Sherry H. Suyu, Geoff C. -F. Chen, Cristian E. Rusu, Martin Millon, Dominique Sluse, Vivien Bonvin, Christopher D. Fassnacht, Stefan Taubenberger, Matthew W. Auger, Simon Birrer, James H. H. Chan, Frederic Courbin, Stefan Hilbert, Olga Tihhonova, Tommaso Treu, Adriano Agnello, Xuheng Ding, Inh Jee, Eiichiro Komatsu, Anowar J. Shajib, Alessandro Sonnenfeld, Roger D. Blandford, Leon V. E. Koopmans, Philip J. Marshall, Georges Meylan

摘要:

我们提出了一个测量的哈勃常数($H_{0}$)和其他宇宙学参数的联合分析的六个引力透镜类星体的测量时间延迟。所有的镜头,除了第一个盲目地分析相对于宇宙学参数。在一个平坦的$Λ$ CDM宇宙学中,我们发现$H_{0} = 73.3_{-1.8}^{+1.7}$,一个2.4%的精度测量,与当地测量的$H_{0}$从Ia型超新星校准的距离阶梯,但在$3.1σ$张力与$Planck$观测的宇宙微波背景(CMB)。这种方法完全独立于超新星和CMB分析。时间延迟宇宙照相术和距离阶梯的组合导致$5.3σ$张力与$Planck$ CMB确定平面$Λ$ CDM中的$H_{0}$。我们计算贝叶斯因子,以验证所有镜头给出统计上一致的结果,表明我们没有低估我们的不确定性,并能够控制我们的系统。我们探索扩展到平面$Λ$ CDM使用时间延迟宇宙学单独的约束,以及与其他宇宙学探针,包括CMB观测$Planck$,重子声振荡,Ia型超新星的组合。延时宇宙学提高了其他探测器的精度,显示出很强的互补性。允许空间曲率并不能解决$Planck$的张力。使用时间延迟宇宙学的距离限制锚定Ia型超新星的距离尺度,我们降低了我们的$H_0$推断宇宙模型假设的敏感性。对于六种不同的宇宙学模型,我们对$H_{0}$的综合推断范围为$\sim73$ - $78~\mathrm{km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$,这与局部距离阶梯约束一致。

英文摘要:

We present a measurement of the Hubble constant ($H_{0}$) and other cosmological parameters from a joint analysis of six gravitationally lensed quasars with measured time delays. All lenses except the first are analyzed blindly with respect to the cosmological parameters. In a flat $Λ$CDM cosmology, we find $H_{0} = 73.3_{-1.8}^{+1.7}$, a 2.4% precision measurement, in agreement with local measurements of $H_{0}$ from type Ia supernovae calibrated by the distance ladder, but in $3.1σ$ tension with $Planck$ observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). This method is completely independent of both the supernovae and CMB analyses. A combination of time-delay cosmography and the distance ladder results is in $5.3σ$ tension with $Planck$ CMB determinations of $H_{0}$ in flat $Λ$CDM. We compute Bayes factors to verify that all lenses give statistically consistent results, showing that we are not underestimating our uncertainties and are able to control our systematics. We explore extensions to flat $Λ$CDM using constraints from time-delay cosmography alone, as well as combinations with other cosmological probes, including CMB observations from $Planck$, baryon acoustic oscillations, and type Ia supernovae. Time-delay cosmography improves the precision of the other probes, demonstrating the strong complementarity. Allowing for spatial curvature does not resolve the tension with $Planck$. Using the distance constraints from time-delay cosmography to anchor the type Ia supernova distance scale, we reduce the sensitivity of our $H_0$ inference to cosmological model assumptions. For six different cosmological models, our combined inference on $H_{0}$ ranges from $\sim73$-$78~\mathrm{km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$, which is consistent with the local distance ladder constraints.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑