arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1906.06409cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-el
收藏

Superfluid stiffness in cuprates: Effect of Mott transition and phase competition

O. Simard, C. -D. Hébert, A. Foley, D. Sénéchal, A. -M. S. Tremblay

英文摘要:

Superfluid stiffness $ρ_s$ is a defining characteristic of the superconducting state, allowing phase coherence and supercurrent. It is accessible experimentally through the penetration depth. Coexistence of $d$-wave superconductivity with other phases in underdoped cuprates, such as antiferromagnetism (AF) or charge-density waves (CDW), may drastically alter $ρ_s$. To shed light on this physics, the zero-temperature value of $ρ_s=ρ_{zz}$ along the $c$-axis was computed for different values of Hubbard interaction $U$ and different sets of tight-binding parameters describing the high-temperature superconductors YBCO and NCCO. We used Cellular Dynamical Mean-Field Theory for the one-band Hubbard model with exact diagonalization as impurity solver and state-of-the-art bath parametrization. We conclude that Mott physics plays a dominant role in determining the superfluid stiffness on the hole-doped side of the phase diagram. On the electron-doped side, antiferromagnetism wins over superconductivity near half-filling. But upon approaching optimal electron-doping, homogeneous coexistence between superconductivity and antiferromagnetism causes the superfluid stiffness to drop sharply. Hence, on the electron-doped side, it is competition between antiferromagnetism and $d$-wave superconductivity that plays a dominant role in determining the value of $ρ_{zz}$ near half-filling. At large overdoping, $ρ_{zz}$ behaves in a more BCS-like manner in both the electron- and hole-doped cases. We comment on some qualitative implications of these results for the superconducting transition temperature.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑