arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1905.06110physics.flu-dyn
收藏

不可压霍尔磁流体力学turbulence的精确定律

On exact laws in incompressible Hall magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

Renaud Ferrand, Sébastien Galtier, Fouad Sahraoui, Romain Meyrand, Nahuel Andrés, Supratik Banerjee

摘要:

对不可压缩霍尔磁流体动力学(IHMHD)湍流中几种现有的精确定律进行了比较,以表明它们的等效性,尽管它们来自不同的数学推导。使用统计同质性,我们重新审视了Hellinger等人提出的定律。(2018)并表明,在通过乘法因子校正后,它可以以更紧凑的形式写成,这意味着仅通量项表示为湍流场的增量。测试了该定律的霍尔贡献,并将其与Galtier(2008)和Banerjee & Galtier(2017)使用具有中等平均磁场的三维电子MHD(EMHD)湍流的直接数值模拟(DNS)导出的其他精确定律进行了比较。我们表明,所研究的法律是等效的惯性范围内,从而提供了几种选择的配方使用根据需要。明确地依赖于平均(指导)字段的表达式可能会导致估计的能量级联率的残余误差,但是,我们证明,这个指导字段可以从这些法律的数学运算后删除。因此,建议使用与平均引导场无关的表达式来分析数值或现场航天器数据。

英文摘要:

A comparison is made between several existing exact laws in incompressible Hall magnetohydrodynamic (IHMHD) turbulence in order to show their equivalence, despite stemming from different mathematical derivations. Using statistical homogeneity, we revisit the law proposed by Hellinger et al. (2018) and show that it can be written, after being corrected by a multiplicative factor, in a more compact form implying only flux terms expressed as increments of the turbulent fields. The Hall contribution of this law is tested and compared to other exact laws derived by Galtier (2008) and Banerjee & Galtier (2017) using direct numerical simulations (DNSs) of three-dimensional electron MHD (EMHD) turbulence with a moderate mean magnetic field. We show that the studied laws are equivalent in the inertial range, thereby offering several choices on the formulation to use depending on the needs. The expressions that depend explicitly on a mean (guide) field may lead to residual errors in estimating the energy cascade rate ; however, we demonstrate that this guide field can be removed from these laws after mathematical manipulation. Therefore, it is recommended to use an expression independent of the mean guide field to analyze numerical or in-situ spacecraft data.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑