arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1905.04022stat.MEmath.STstat.APstat.MLstat.TH
收藏

使用连续排序概率得分分布评估极值的概率预报

Evaluating probabilistic forecasts of extremes using continuous ranked probability score distributions

Maxime Taillardat, Anne-Laure Fougères, Philippe Naveau, Raphaël de Fondeville

摘要:

极端事件的概率预测是一个非常活跃的研究领域,因为大众媒体和公众舆论自然会关注极端事件,并且很容易得出有偏见的结论。在这种情况下,为极端事件定制的经典验证方法,如阈值和加权评分规则,具有无法缓解的不良特性,众所周知的连续排名概率得分(CRPS)也不例外。在本文中,我们定义了一个正式的框架来评估极端事件的预测评估程序的行为,我们用它来证明,评估的基础上期望一个适当的分数是不适合极端。另外,我们建议研究的CRPS作为一个随机变量的属性,通过使用极值理论来解决极端事件验证。引入了一个指数来比较校准的预测,它总结了概率预测预测极端的能力。这种方法的优点和局限性进行了讨论,使用理论论证和模拟。

英文摘要:

Verifying probabilistic forecasts for extreme events is a highly active research area because popular media and public opinions are naturally focused on extreme events, and biased conclusions are readily made. In this context, classical verification methods tailored for extreme events, such as thresholded and weighted scoring rules, have undesirable properties that cannot be mitigated, and the well-known continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) is no exception. In this paper, we define a formal framework for assessing the behavior of forecast evaluation procedures with respect to extreme events, which we use to demonstrate that assessment based on the expectation of a proper score is not suitable for extremes. Alternatively, we propose studying the properties of the CRPS as a random variable by using extreme value theory to address extreme event verification. An index is introduced to compare calibrated forecasts, which summarizes the ability of probabilistic forecasts for predicting extremes. The strengths and limitations of this method are discussed using both theoretical arguments and simulations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑