arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 1806.03261astro-ph.COgr-qc
收藏

用宇宙学数据测量物质密度扰动幅度

The measurements of matter density perturbations amplitude from cosmological data

R. A. Burenin

摘要:

我们比较了线性物质密度扰动振幅$sigma_8$的各种物理不同的测量,这些测量是从CMB各向异性、星系团质量函数、弱引力透镜、物质功率谱和红移空间畸变的观测中获得的。我们表明,$σ_8$测量CMB引力透镜信号的基础上普朗克CMB温度各向异性数据在高多极,$\ell>1000$,矛盾的所有其他测量从剩余的普朗克CMB各向异性数据和其他宇宙学数据,在约$3.7σ$的显着性水平。因此,这些数据目前不应该与其他数据结合起来限制宇宙学参数。除了普朗克宇宙微波背景辐射温度各向异性的高多极数据外,所有其他的测量都彼此吻合,并给出了以下线性密度扰动幅度的测量:$σ_8=0.792\pm0.006$,宇宙平均密度:$Ω_m=0.287\pm0.007$,哈勃常数:$H_0 = 69.4\pm 0.6$ ~km~s $^{-1}$ ~Mpc $^{-1}$。考虑到重子声学振荡和(或)哈勃常数的直接测量数据,可以得到中微子质量和相对论性粒子数的不同约束。

英文摘要:

We compare various physically different measurements of linear matter density perturbation amplitude, $sigma_8$, which are obtained from the observations of CMB anisotropy, galaxy cluster mass function, weak gravitation lensing, matter power spectrum and redshift space distortions. We show that $σ_8$ measurement from CMB gravitational lensing signal based on Planck CMB temperature anisotropy data at high multipoles, $\ell>1000$, contradict to all other measurements obtained both from remaining Planck CMB anisotropy data and from other cosmological data, at about $3.7σ$ significance level. Therefore, these data currently should not be combined with other data to constrain cosmological parameters. With the exception of Planck CMB temperature anisotropy data at high multipoles, all other measurements are in good agreement between each other and give the following measurements of linear density perturbation amplitude: $σ_8=0.792\pm0.006$, mean density of the Universe: $Ω_m=0.287\pm0.007$, and Hubble constant: $H_0 = 69.4\pm 0.6$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$. Taking in account the data on baryon acoustic oscillations and (or) direct measurements of the Hubble constant, one can obtain different constraints on sum of neutrino mass and number of relativistic species.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑