arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1802.09730hep-thgr-qc
收藏

因果全息信息不满足线性化量子聚焦条件

Causal holographic information does not satisfy the linearized quantum focusing condition

Zicao Fu, Donald Marolf, Marvin Qi

摘要:

由全息量子场论(QFT)的区域$R$定义的Hubeny-Rangamani因果全息信息(CHI)是事件视界面积可能与熵有关的想法的现代版本。在这里,事件视界存在于一个对偶引力体理论中,牛顿常数为$G_{\rm bulk}$,关系式中包含一个因子$4G_{\rm bulk}$。CHI被冯诺伊曼熵$S$限制在下面的事实表明CHI是粗粒度的。因此,其性质可能与$S$的性质明显不同。特别是,最近的结果表明,当$d\le 4$全息QFT微扰耦合到$d$ -维引力,组合系统满足所谓的量子聚焦条件(QFC)在领导级的新的引力耦合$G_d$时,QFT熵是冯诺依曼。然而,通过研究在共形框架中的球形体(反-de Sitter)Schwarschild黑洞的对偶状态,其边界是一个$(2+1)$维de Sitter空间,我们发现CHI定义的QFC被违反,即使在Killing视界和使用一个单一的零同余扰动。由于它是已知的,广义第二定律(GSL)在这种情况下,我们的工作表明,QFC是不需要为了熵,或类熵量,以满足这样的GSL。

英文摘要:

The Hubeny-Rangamani causal holographic information (CHI) defined by a region $R$ of a holographic quantum field theory (QFT) is a modern version of the idea that the area of event horizons might be related to an entropy. Here the event horizon lives in a dual gravitational bulk theory with Newton's constant $G_{\rm bulk}$, and the relation involves a factor of $4G_{\rm bulk}$. The fact that CHI is bounded below by the von Neumann entropy $S$ suggests that CHI is coarse-grained. Its properties could thus differ markedly from those of $S$. In particular, recent results imply that when $d\le 4$ holographic QFTs are perturbatively coupled to $d$-dimensional gravity, the combined system satisfies the so-called quantum focusing condition (QFC) at leading order in the new gravitational coupling $G_d$ when the QFT entropy is taken to be that of von Neumann. However, by studying states dual to spherical bulk (anti--de Sitter) Schwarschild black holes in the conformal frame for which the boundary is a $(2+1)$-dimensional de Sitter space, we find the QFC defined by CHI is violated even when perturbing about a Killing horizon and using a single null congruence. Since it is known that a generalized second law (GSL) holds in this context, our work demonstrates that the QFC is not required in order for an entropy, or an entropy-like quantity, to satisfy such a GSL.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑