arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1802.05089astro-ph.COgr-qc
收藏

引力波的引力透镜:统计观点

Gravitational lensing of gravitational waves: A statistical perspective

Shun-Sheng Li, Shude Mao, Yuetong Zhao, Youjun Lu

摘要:

本文从统计的角度研究了引力波(GWs)的强引力透镜效应,重点研究了恒星双星黑洞合并产生的高频GWs。这些都是最有前途的目标,地面探测器,如先进的激光干涉仪引力波天文台(aLIGO)和拟议的爱因斯坦望远镜(ET),可以安全地处理下的几何光学限制GW传播。我们执行一个彻底的计算的透镜率,考虑到所造成的影响,透镜星系的椭圆率,透镜环境,放大率偏差。我们发现,在某些GW源率的情况下,我们应该能够观察到强透镜GW事件每年一次($\sim1~\text{yr}^{-1}$)在aLIGO调查在其设计灵敏度;对于拟议的ET调查,率可能高达$\sim80~\text{yr}^{-1}$。这些结果取决于GW源丰度的估计,因此可以相应地修改与改进我们的恒星双星黑洞的合并率的理解。我们还计算了每项调查中四图像透镜系统的比例,预测aLIGO调查的比例为$\sim30$ %,ET调查的比例为$\sim6$ %。最后,我们评估了由于有限的调查持续时间丢失一些图像的可能性,通过呈现透镜时间延迟的概率分布。我们预测,在未来的GW调查中,这种选择偏差将是微不足道的,因为大多数晶状体系统($\sim90$ %)的时间延迟将小于$\sim1$月,这将远远短于调查持续时间。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we study the strong gravitational lensing of gravitational waves (GWs) from a statistical perspective, with particular focus on the high frequency GWs from stellar binary black hole coalescences. These are most promising targets for ground-based detectors such as Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (aLIGO) and the proposed Einstein Telescope (ET) and can be safely treated under the geometrical optics limit for GW propagation. We perform a thorough calculation of the lensing rate, by taking account of effects caused by the ellipticity of lensing galaxies, lens environments, and magnification bias. We find that in certain GW source rate scenarios, we should be able to observe strongly lensed GW events once per year ($\sim1~\text{yr}^{-1}$) in the aLIGO survey at its design sensitivity; for the proposed ET survey, the rate could be as high as $\sim80~\text{yr}^{-1}$. These results depend on the estimate of GW source abundance, and hence can be correspondingly modified with an improvement in our understanding of the merger rate of stellar binary black holes. We also compute the fraction of four-image lens systems in each survey, predicting it to be $\sim30$ per cent for the aLIGO survey and $\sim6$ per cent for the ET survey. Finally, we evaluate the possibility of missing some images due to the finite survey duration, by presenting the probability distribution of lensing time delays. We predict that this selection bias will be insignificant in future GW surveys, as most of the lens systems ($\sim90$ per cent) will have time delays less than $\sim1$ month, which will be far shorter than survey durations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑