arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1801.06359math.DSmath.CV
收藏

关于整函数下simply-connected域的连通原像

On connected preimages of simply-connected domains under entire functions

Lasse Rempe-Gillen, Dave Sixsmith

摘要:

设$f$为超越整函数,$U,V\subset\mathbb{C}$为不相交单连通域.是否必须断开$f^{-1}(U)$和$f^{-1}(V)$之一?1970年,Baker隐式地给出了这个问题的肯定回答,目的是证明一个超越整函数不能有两个不相交的完全不变域。(如果$f^{-1}(U)=U$,则域$U\subset \mathbb{C}$在$f$下是完全不变的。)最近Julien Duval观察到Baker的论证中有一个缺陷(这也被用于后来的Baker结果的推广和扩展)。我们表明,上述问题的答案是否定的,所以这个缺陷无法修复。事实上,对于函数$f(z)= e^z+z$,存在无限多个成对不相交的单连通域的集合,每个域都有连通的原像。我们还回答了一个长期存在的问题Eremenko给出了一个例子的超越整函数,无限多个极点,具有相同的属性。此外,我们还证明了存在一个具有上述性质的函数$f$,使得奇异值集$S(f)$是有界的,换句话说,$f$属于Eremenko-Lyubich类。另一方面,如果$S(f)$是有限的(或者如果强加某些附加的假设),许多原始结果确实成立。为了研究社区的方便,我们还包括贝克论文证明中的错误描述,以及其他受影响论文的摘要。

英文摘要:

Let $f$ be a transcendental entire function, and let $U,V\subset\mathbb{C}$ be disjoint simply-connected domains. Must one of $f^{-1}(U)$ and $f^{-1}(V)$ be disconnected? In 1970, Baker implicitly gave a positive answer to this question, in order to prove that a transcendental entire function cannot have two disjoint completely invariant domains. (A domain $U\subset \mathbb{C}$ is completely invariant under $f$ if $f^{-1}(U)=U$.) It was recently observed by Julien Duval that there is a flaw in Baker's argument (which has also been used in later generalisations and extensions of Baker's result). We show that the answer to the above question is negative; so this flaw cannot be repaired. Indeed, for the function $f(z)= e^z+z$, there is a collection of infinitely many pairwise disjoint simply-connected domains, each with connected preimage. We also answer a long-standing question of Eremenko by giving an example of a transcendental entire function, with infinitely many poles, which has the same property. Furthermore, we show that there exists a function $f$ with the above properties such that additionally the set of singular values $S(f)$ is bounded; in other words, $f$ belongs to the Eremenko-Lyubich class. On the other hand, if $S(f)$ is finite (or if certain additional hypotheses are imposed), many of the original results do hold. For the convenience of the research community, we also include a description of the error in the proof of Baker's paper, and a summary of other papers that are affected.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑