arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1708.09221cs.DScs.CGcs.DM
收藏

图书制图算法的实验评价

Experimental Evaluation of Book Drawing Algorithms

Jonathan Klawitter, Tamara Mchedlidze, Martin Nöllenburg

摘要:

图$G=(V,E)$的$k$ -页书绘图由其顶点沿脊的线性排序和每个边到$k$页之一的分配组成,所述页是由脊限定的半平面。在书本绘图中,当且仅当两条边指定给同一页且它们的顶点沿书脊交替时,它们才相交。在$k$页面的书籍绘图中,交叉最小化是NP难的,但是书籍绘图在可视化和其他方面有多种应用。因此,存在几种启发式书籍绘制算法,但没有更广泛的比较研究,他们的相对性能。在本文中,我们提出了一个全面的基准集具有挑战性的图形类的书籍绘制算法,并提供了一个广泛的实验研究现有的书籍绘制算法的性能。

英文摘要:

A $k$-page book drawing of a graph $G=(V,E)$ consists of a linear ordering of its vertices along a spine and an assignment of each edge to one of the $k$ pages, which are half-planes bounded by the spine. In a book drawing, two edges cross if and only if they are assigned to the same page and their vertices alternate along the spine. Crossing minimization in a $k$-page book drawing is NP-hard, yet book drawings have multiple applications in visualization and beyond. Therefore several heuristic book drawing algorithms exist, but there is no broader comparative study on their relative performance. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive benchmark set of challenging graph classes for book drawing algorithms and provide an extensive experimental study of the performance of existing book drawing algorithms.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑