arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1707.07884quant-phphysics.hist-ph
收藏

驯服延迟选择量子擦除器

Taming the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser

University of Oxford(牛津大学)

Johannes Fankhauser

AI总结:

探讨延迟选择量子擦除器实验,通过类比贝尔型测量在标准量子力学中解释,指出其类似贝尔型场景无神秘之处,消除所谓‘时间回溯影响’问题,在德布罗意 - 玻姆图景中粒子轨迹可明确描述。

摘要:

我通过类比贝尔型测量并在标准量子力学中给出直接解释来讨论延迟选择量子擦除器实验(DCQE)。延迟选择量子擦除器实验类似于贝尔型场景,其悖论的解决相当简单,并无神秘之处。乍一看,该实验表明对纠缠光子对的一部分(闲子)的测量可用于控制光子对另一部分(信号子)通过双缝后在屏幕上的测量结果是否产生干涉条纹。重要的是,有无干涉的选择可在信号光子遇到屏幕很久之后做出。实验结果据称引发了某种‘时间回溯影响’。我认为通过适当考虑信号光子的作用可以消除这个问题。同样,在德布罗意 - 玻姆图景中,在实验过程中的任何时刻粒子轨迹都能得到明确描述。因此,再次表明无需诉诸任何‘时间回溯影响’。

英文摘要:

I discuss the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment (DCQE) by drawing an analogy to a Bell-type measurement and giving a straightforward account in standard quantum mechanics. The delayed choice quantum eraser experiment turns out to resemble a Bell-type scenario in which the paradox's resolution is rather trivial, and so there really is no mystery. At first glance, the experiment suggests that measurements on one part of an entangled photon pair (the idler) can be employed to control whether the measurement outcome of the other part of the photon pair (the signal) produces interference fringes at a screen after being sent through a double slit. Significantly, the choice whether there is interference or not can be made long after the signal photon encounters the screen. The results of the experiment have been alleged to invoke some sort of 'backwards in time influence'. I argue that this issue can be eliminated by taking into proper account the role of the signal photon. Likewise, in the de Broglie-Bohm picture the particle's trajectories can be given a well-defined description at any instant of time during the experiment. Thus, it is again clear that there is no need to resort to any kind of 'backwards in time influence'.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑