arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1707.07563gr-qchep-th
收藏

“黑暗”和“光明”物理学之间有联系吗?

Is there a connection between "dark" and "light" physics?

Matthew J. Lake

摘要:

在$^{\rm th}$世纪早期和中期,狄拉克和泽尔多维奇是最早提出宇宙学和原子物理学之间存在密切联系的科学家之一。尽管在当时是一个革命性的提议,狄拉克的大数假设(1937)采用了当时的标准假设,即宇宙学常数项($Λ= 0$)不存在。结果,它的实施需要对广义相对论进行极端的暴力--很少有物理学家愿意为了“数字命理学”而牺牲这一点--需要一种形式为$G(t) \sim 1/t$的依赖于时间的引力耦合。泽尔多维奇(1968)的洞察力是认识到一个小的但不为零的宇宙学项($Λ> 0$)允许我们将宇宙的现今半径与德西特半径($r_{\rm U} \simeq l_{\rm dS} \simeq 1/{\sqrtΛ}$)等同起来,这就消除了基本耦合中对时间依赖性的需要。因此,他得到了公式$Λ\simeq m^6G^2/\hbar^4$,其中$m$是一个质量标度,表征引力和电磁相互作用的相对强度,他将其与质子质量$m_{\rm p}$等同起来。在本文中,我们回顾了一些最近的论点,而不是建议识别$m = m_{\rm e}/α_{\rm e}$,其中$m_{\rm e}$是电子质量和$α_{\rm e} = e^2/\hbar c \simeq 1/137$是通常的精细结构常数。我们注意到,这些都是{ \it物理}性质的,因此,代表了一种尝试,将以前的论点\emph{{\` a} la}狄拉克从数字命理学领域提升到经验科学领域。如果有效的话,这些论点不仅表明宏观世界和微观世界之间存在密切联系,而且可能更令人惊讶的是,“黑暗”和“光明”物理学的本质之间也存在密切联系。

英文摘要:

In the early-mid 20$^{\rm th}$ century Dirac and Zel'dovich were among the first scientists to suggest an intimate connection between cosmology and atomic physics. Though a revolutionary proposal for its time, Dirac's Large Number Hypothesis (1937) adopted a standard assumption of the day, namely, the non-existence of the cosmological constant term ($Λ= 0$). As a result, its implementation necessitated extreme violence to the theory of general relativity -- something few physicists were prepared to sacrifice in favour of `numerology' -- requiring a time-dependent gravitational coupling of the form $G(t) \sim 1/t$. Zel'dovich's insight (1968) was to realise that a small but nonzero cosmological term ($Λ> 0$) allowed the present day radius of the Universe to be identified with the de Sitter radius, $r_{\rm U} \simeq l_{\rm dS} \simeq 1/{\sqrtΛ}$, which removed the need for time-dependence in the fundamental couplings. Thus, he obtained the formula $Λ\simeq m^6G^2/\hbar^4$, where $m$ is a mass scale characterising the relative strengths of the gravitational and electromagnetic interactions, which he identified with the proton mass $m_{\rm p}$. In this paper, we review a number of recent arguments which, instead, suggest the identification $m = m_{\rm e}/α_{\rm e}$, where $m_{\rm e}$ is the electron mass and $α_{\rm e} = e^2/\hbar c \simeq 1/137$ is the usual fine structure constant. We note that these are of a {\it physical} nature and, therefore, represent an attempt to lift previous arguments \emph{{\` a} la} Dirac from the realm of numerology into the realm of empirical science. If valid, such arguments suggest an intimate connection, not only between the macroscopic and microscopic worlds, but, perhaps even more surprisingly, between the very essence of "dark" and "light" physics.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑