arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1506.03255physics.acc-ph
收藏

波荡器中辐射的电子谱和相干性

Electron spectra and coherence of radiation in undulators

Eugene Bulyak, Nikolay Shul'ga

摘要:

硬X射线和γ射线区域中最亮的辐射源是波荡器源和康普顿源。这些源是未来直线对撞机ILC、CLIC所必需的极化正电子的最终产生源。我们开发了一种新的方法来评估电子发射的波荡器和逆康普顿辐射的能谱。基于电子态的泊松加权叠加的方法适用于每个电子通过驱动力的发射强度的整个范围,从远小于单位发射光子(康普顿源)到许多发射光子(波荡器),并且适用于任何能量的光子。该方法允许帐户的贡献,在能量传播的泊松统计和扩散由于反冲。仿真结果验证了理论分析的正确性。电子能谱用于评价光子的轴上密度及其利用发射光子的“载波包络”表示的相干性。评估的最大相干度的单电子辐射的评估是成正比的波荡器的空间周期和成反比的电子的能量,相干发射的波荡器周期的数量几乎独立的波荡器偏转参数。我们的研究结果既适用于经典波荡器的经典极限,也适用于康普顿γ射线源的量子极限。

英文摘要:

Most bright sources of the radiation in hard x-ray and gamma--ray regions are undulator sources and Compton based ones. These sources are ultimate for production of polarized positrons necessary for future linear colliders ILC, CLIC. We developed a novel method for evaluating the energy spectrum of electrons emitting the undulator- and the inverse Compton radiation. The method based on Poisson weighted superposition of electron states is applicable for whole range of the emission intensity per electron pass through the driving force, from much less than unity emitted photons (Compton sources) to many photons emitted (undulators), and for any energy of the photons. The method allows for account contributions in the energy spread both from the Poisson statistics and diffusion due to recoils. The theoretical results were confirmed by simulations. The electron energy spectrum was used for evaluation of the on-axis density of photons and their coherency making use of the `carrier--envelope' presentation for the emitting photons. The evaluated maximum coherency degree of single--electron radiation is evaluated to be proportional to the undulator spatial period and inversely to the energy of electrons, the number of coherently emitted undulator periods almost independent of the undulator deflection parameter. The results of our study are applicable both for the classical limit of classical undulator and for the quantum limit of Compton gamma--ray sources.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑