arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1502.07347astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA
收藏

星系团质量重建计划:II。使用对比模拟目录量化分散和偏差

Galaxy Cluster Mass Reconstruction Project: II. Quantifying scatter and bias using contrasting mock catalogues

L. Old, R. Wojtak, G. A. Mamon, R. A. Skibba, F. R. Pearce, D. Croton, S. Bamford, P. Behroozi, R. de Carvalho, J. C. Muñoz-Cuartas, D. Gifford, M. E. Gray, A. … 展开作者

L. Old, R. Wojtak, G. A. Mamon, R. A. Skibba, F. R. Pearce, D. Croton, S. Bamford, P. Behroozi, R. de Carvalho, J. C. Muñoz-Cuartas, D. Gifford, M. E. Gray, A. von der Linden, M. R. Merrifield, S. I. Muldrew, V. Müller, R. J. Pearson, T. J. Ponman, E. Rozo, E. Rykoff, A. Saro, T. Sepp, C. Sifón, E. Tempel

摘要:

这篇文章是一系列文章中的第二篇,我们对各种基于星系的星系团质量估计技术进行了广泛的比较,这些技术利用了星系的位置,速度和颜色。我们的目标是量化的分散,系统的偏见和完整性的集群群众来自一个不同的25个星系为基础的方法,使用两个对比的模拟星系星表的基础上一个复杂的晕占领模型和半解析模型。分析968个聚类,我们发现不同方法提供的log M200 c的RMS误差范围很宽(0.18至1.08 dex,即,系数约为1.5至12),无论输入模型假设如何,丰度匹配和丰度方法都能提供最佳结果。此外,某些方法产生了大量的灾难性情况,其中质量被低估或高估了10倍以上。考虑到簇质量函数的高质量端急剧下降,我们建议将基于丰度或丰度匹配的方法与这些方法结合使用,作为选择高质量簇的研究的合理性检查。我们看到一个更强的相关性恢复到输入的星系数的两个目录相比,集团/集群的质量,但是,这并不能保证正确的成员星系被选中。我们没有观察到显着更高的散射无论是模拟星系目录。我们的研究结果具有宇宙学分析的影响,利用质量,丰富度,或丰度的集群,这有不同的不确定性时,使用不同的方法。

英文摘要:

This article is the second in a series in which we perform an extensive comparison of various galaxy-based cluster mass estimation techniques that utilise the positions, velocities and colours of galaxies. Our aim is to quantify the scatter, systematic bias and completeness of cluster masses derived from a diverse set of 25 galaxy-based methods using two contrasting mock galaxy catalogues based on a sophisticated halo occupation model and a semi-analytic model. Analysing 968 clusters, we find a wide range in the RMS errors in log M200c delivered by the different methods (0.18 to 1.08 dex, i.e., a factor of ~1.5 to 12), with abundance matching and richness methods providing the best results, irrespective of the input model assumptions. In addition, certain methods produce a significant number of catastrophic cases where the mass is under- or over-estimated by a factor greater than 10. Given the steeply falling high-mass end of the cluster mass function, we recommend that richness or abundance matching-based methods are used in conjunction with these methods as a sanity check for studies selecting high mass clusters. We see a stronger correlation of the recovered to input number of galaxies for both catalogues in comparison with the group/cluster mass, however, this does not guarantee that the correct member galaxies are being selected. We do not observe significantly higher scatter for either mock galaxy catalogues. Our results have implications for cosmological analyses that utilise the masses, richnesses, or abundances of clusters, which have different uncertainties when different methods are used.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑