arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1411.1122cs.CGcs.ET
收藏

温度为1的3D自组装的最佳程序大小复杂性

Optimal program-size complexity for self-assembly at temperature 1 in 3D

David Furcy, Samuel Micka, Scott M. Summers

摘要:

工作在一个三维的变体Winfree的抽象瓷砖组装模型,我们表明,对于所有的$N \in \mathbb{N}$,有一个瓷砖集,唯一的自组装成一个$N \times N$正方形在温度1与最佳程序大小的复杂性$O(\log N / \log \log N)$(程序大小的复杂性,也称为瓷砖复杂性,形状是唯一的瓷砖类型所需的最小数量的唯一自组装它)。此外,我们的构造是“刚刚好”的3D,在这个意义上,它的作品,即使当瓷砖的位置被限制在$z = 0$和$z = 1$平面。这一结果肯定地回答了Cook,Fu,Schweller提出的一个未决问题(SODA 2011)。为了实现这一结果,我们开发了一个通用的3D温度1最佳编码结构,让人想起Soloveichik和Winfree(SICOMP 2007)的2D温度2最佳编码结构,也许是独立的兴趣。

英文摘要:

Working in a three-dimensional variant of Winfree's abstract Tile Assembly Model, we show that, for all $N \in \mathbb{N}$, there is a tile set that uniquely self-assembles into an $N \times N$ square shape at temperature 1 with optimal program-size complexity of $O(\log N / \log \log N)$ (the program-size complexity, also known as tile complexity, of a shape is the minimum number of unique tile types required to uniquely self-assemble it). Moreover, our construction is "just barely" 3D in the sense that it works even when the placement of tiles is restricted to the $z = 0$ and $z = 1$ planes. This result affirmatively answers an open question from Cook, Fu, Schweller (SODA 2011). To achieve this result, we develop a general 3D temperature 1 optimal encoding construction, reminiscent of the 2D temperature 2 optimal encoding construction of Soloveichik and Winfree (SICOMP 2007), and perhaps of independent interest.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑