arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1405.6038astro-ph.SR
收藏

太阳耀斑中的等离子体加热及其软、硬X射线发射

Plasma heating in solar flares and their soft and hard X-ray emissions

R. Falewicz

摘要:

本文分析了在X射线中观测到的两个单圈状耀斑的能量收支,假定非热电子是两个事件的所有阶段中唯一的等离子体加热源。RHESSI和GOES分别于2002年2月20日和6月2日观测到耀斑。利用RHESSI观测数据,用一维流体动力学程序计算了这两次耀斑的色球能量。利用Fokker-Planck公式计算了耀斑环中NTE的分布,从而计算了选定能量范围内的X射线非热辐射和积分通量的空间分布,并与观测结果进行了比较。对2002年6月2日事件,在0.5- 4A的GOES范围和6-12 keV、12-25 keV、20-25 keV和50- 100 keV能量带的总通量,模型与观测值的相容性最好。在高能量范围内的各个耀斑结构的光度测定结果表明,最好的遵守发生在2002年6月2日耀斑,其中合成的排放量比观测到的排放量高30%或更多。这些差异的一部分可能是由所应用的方法的不可避免的缺陷引起的,例如假设耀斑的模型是对称的,并且来自耀斑环路的脚的排放没有差异,以及所应用的数值1D代码和程序的相对简单性。尽管存在这些问题,模拟结果与观测结果的整理表明,软和硬X射线发射观察到的分析单循环一样的事件可以完全解释由电子束驱动的蒸发。

英文摘要:

In this paper, the energy budgets of two single-loop like flares observed in X- ray are analysed under the assumption that non-thermal electrons (NTEs) are the only source of plasma heating during all phases of both events. The flares were observed by RHESSI and GOES on February 20th, 2002 and June 2nd, 2002, respectively. Using a 1D hydrodynamic code for both flares the energy deposited in the chromosphere was derived applying RHESSI observational data. The use of the Fokker-Planck formalism permits the calculation of distributions of the NTEs in flaring loops, thus spatial distributions of the X-ray non-thermal emissions and integral fluxes for the selected energy ranges which were compared with the observed ones. The best compatibility of the model with the observations was obtained for the June 2nd, 2002 event in both the 0.5-4 A GOES range and total fluxes in the 6-12 keV, 12-25 keV, 20-25 keV and 50- 100 keV energy bands. Results of photometry of the individual flaring structures in a high energy range shows that the best compliance occurred for the June 2nd, 2002 flare, where the synthesized emissions were 30% or more higher than the observed emissions. Some part of these differences may be caused by inevitable flaws of the applied methodology, like by an assumption that the model of the flare is symmetric and there are no differences in the emissions originating from the feet of the flare's loop and by relative simplicity of the applied numerical 1D code and procedures. Despite these problems, a collation of modelled results with observations shows that soft and hard X-ray emissions observed for analysed single-loop like events may be fully explained by electron beam-driven evaporation only.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑