论文发表对合著者核心规模测量的影响
Effects of Publications in Proceedings on the Measure of the Core Size of Coauthors
摘要：
“主要研究者”（LI）的共同作者（CA）可以根据其与LI共同发表的联合出版物的“重要性”获得等级（r）。在没有任何证据的情况下，人们普遍认为，同行评审期刊和会议记录中的出版物在简历中没有相同的“价值”。对百科全书和书籍章节的贡献也是如此。本文研究了如果将总体出版物列表分解为这些特定类型的出版物，则某些科学家与她/他的合著者的出版物数量（J）之间的关系（根据其重要性递减进行排序，即Ausloos发现的$ J \propto 1/r^α $）是否仍然成立。几位作者，不同的职业，但主要是在统计力学领域工作，在这里研究整理出问题的答案。只有当J和r的最大值很大并且是$\sim +1$时，指数$α$才是弱科学家依赖的。$m_A$的核心价值，即核证机关的核心数目，只适用于会议录，约为总数的一半，即计算所有出版物。百科全书和书籍章节对数值的贡献是微不足道的。时间跨度对$m_A$的作用也在两种情况下，在有关的职业活动的考虑。可以认为，这些发现是关于如何量化个人（出版物）职业生涯的对比观点，正如彼得森等人最近所做的那样，这里强调的是合作的规模和发展，而不是引用次数，此外还说明了出版物的类型。通过不同的$m_A$，可以区分具有CA的科学家出版物的不同行为模式。
英文摘要：
Coauthors (CA) of a "lead investigator" (LI) can receive a rank (r) according to their "importance" in having published joint publications with the LI. It is commonly accepted, without any proof, that publications in peer review journals and e.g. conference proceedings do not have the same "value" in a CV. Same for papers contributed to encyclopedia and book chapters. It is here examined whether the relationship between the number (J) of publications of some scientist with her/his coauthors, ranked according to their decreasing importance, i.e. $ J \propto 1/r^α $, as found by Ausloos, still holds if the overall publication list is broken into such specific types of publications. Several authors, with different careers, but mainly having worked in the field of statistical mechanics, are studied here to sort out answers to the questions. The exponent $α$ turns out to be weakly scientist dependent, only if the maximum value of J and r is large and is $\sim +1$ then. The $m_A$ core value, i.e. the core number of CAs, for proceedings only is about half of the total one, i.e. when all publications are counted. Contributions to the numerical values from both encyclopedia and book chapters are marginal. The role of a time span on $m_A$ is also examined in two cases in relation to career activity considerations. It can considered that the findings serve as a contrasting point of view on how to quantify an individual (publication) career as recently done by Petersen et al., here emphasizing the collaboration size and evolution, rather than a citation count, moreover specifying the type of publication. Through the various $m_A$'s one can distinguish different behavior patterns of a scientist publication with CAs.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
