子场对合著者核心的影响
Subfield Effects on the Core of Coauthors
摘要：
研究了一位“主要科学家”与她/他的合著者（联合）出版物的数量（$J$）是否根据等级（$r$）的重要性进行排名，即$ J \propto 1/r $，如Ausloos [1]所发现的那样，仍然适用于子领域，即当“主要科学家”在不同的，有时重叠的子领域工作时。两个案例进行了研究。它表明，法律适用于大子场。如图所示，在附录中，将小主题组合成大主题以获得更好的统计数据也很有用。据观察，子核心是远远小于整体合著者的核心措施。然而，核心和次核心的规模较小，可能意味着需要进一步考虑对团队研究目的和活动的评价。
英文摘要：
It is examined whether the number ($J$) of (joint) publications of a "main scientist" with her/his coauthors ranked according to rank ($r$) importance, i.e. $ J \propto 1/r $, as found by Ausloos [1] still holds for subfields, i.e. when the "main scientist" has worked on different, sometimes overlapping, subfields. Two cases are studied. It is shown that the law holds for large subfields. As shown, in an Appendix, is also useful to combine small topics into large ones for better statistics. It is observed that the sub-cores are much smaller than the overall coauthor core measure. Nevertheless, the smallness of the core and sub-cores may imply further considerations for the evaluation of team research purposes and activities.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
