arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1104.2368cs.NI
收藏

DSR、AODV和DSDV MANET路由协议下随机路点和随机行走移动模型的比较

Comparison of Random Waypoint & Random Walk Mobility Model under DSR, AODV & DSDV MANET Routing Protocols

Muhammad Zaheer Aslam, Abdur Rashid

摘要:

移动自组织网络是一种无线自组织网络,节点之间通过无线方式连接,网络具有自配置能力。MANET可以以独立的方式工作,或者可以是另一个网络的一部分。本文比较了随机行走移动模型和随机路点移动模型在两种反应式路由协议动态源路由(DSR)和自组织按需距离矢量路由(AODV)以及一种主动式路由协议距离顺序距离矢量路由(DSDV)上的性能。AODV和DSDV在随机游走和随机路点移动模型下对于类似的输入具有类似的结果,但是随着暂停时间的增加,性能的差异也会增加。结果表明,在两种移动模型下,它们的运动、方向、方向角、速度是相同的。对它们的分组投递率、吞吐量和路由开销进行了分析。我们已经用不同的标准测试了它们,比如不同的节点数量,速度和不同的最大连接数。

英文摘要:

Mobile Adhoc Network is a kind of wireless ad hoc network where nodes are connected wirelessly and the network is self configuring. MANET may work in a standalone manner or may be a part of another network. In this paper we have compared Random Walk Mobility Model and Random Waypoint Mobility Model over two reactive routing protocols Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) and Adhoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) protocol and one Proactive routing protocol Distance Sequenced Distance Vector Routing (DSDV) Our analysis showed that DSR, AODV & DSDV under Random Walk and Random Way Point Mobility models have similar results for similar inputs however as the pause time increases so does the difference in performance rises. They show that their motion, direction, angle of direction, speed is same under both mobility models. We have made their analysis on packet delivery ratio, throughput and routing overhead. We have tested them with different criteria like different number of nodes, speed and different maximum number of connections.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑